Print Topic - Archive

BTD Forums  /  The Encyclopedia/ D'Adamo Library  /  Cancer... Is a Fungus???
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Saturday, August 23, 2008, 7:47pm
This guy says that cancer is really just the Candida yeast/fungus:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQuODiMlUsc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri-C8VvF3Rs&feature=related

=============

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npgyZMaewuE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJMfrV43ku4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0PC9EQPiNU
Posted by: 815 (Guest), Saturday, August 23, 2008, 8:42pm; Reply: 1
I a wonder what a Dr. D  a thinks about a dis?  ;D

ewww on the scope.

After thinking about this..I'm changing my statemtent: They have discovered the link of viruses to CA so why not some fungi? Some fungi could present itself in the body as similar/mimic to CA. This particular fungus could have fooled this paisan into believing that all CA is caused by fungus.
Posted by: Amazone I., Saturday, August 23, 2008, 8:51pm; Reply: 2
:-/ :o ??)...noooo...... a multi functional issue... ;)

I'm just reading the book about and from that psychatrist called David Servan-Schreiber...an authentic issue but for that also very  ::) coz here also beliefs  are done as the ultima ratio  :P
this man never has met Peter D'Adamo....nor does he ever saw the positive reslults of http://www.orthomed.org nor other orthomolecular
therapsits.... :o :o :-/ :B
Posted by: ABJoe, Saturday, August 23, 2008, 10:07pm; Reply: 3
Quoted from 521
This guy says that cancer is really just the Candida yeast/fungus


Ron,

This makes a lot of sense because cancer has the ability to change to meet varying changes in the body.  The only disease agent that we know of (virus, bacteria or fungus) that has this ability is fungus.  Unless there is some other agent discovered, fungus must be the base for cancer.  

When I asked my practitioner about this, she said that she had just studied about this and that it was correct.
Posted by: 815 (Guest), Saturday, August 23, 2008, 11:12pm; Reply: 4
Quoted from Amazone I.
his man never has met Peter D'Adamo....nor does he ever saw the positive reslults of http://www.orthomed.org nor other orthomolecular therapsits.... :o :o :-/ :B


Again, here is another allopath, trying to treat the symptoms instead of balancing the body and letting it cure itself..
Right?

Posted by: Amazone I., Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:39am; Reply: 5
yep Mayflower, but he was the  victim of himself and now gives
advices for foods and supps. for cancer preventions... but what I really dislike is, that always Peter's advices..given decades before (and of course also other valide options;) )...are just
taken as it wasn't given or said .... :P
that makes me (dizzy)(dizzy)(angry)(mad)(dead)(shhh)(whistle)
the same here in Switzerland.....the docs are afraid to tell the truth and helping in sustaining cancer patients correctly!!!
This is one of the facts....and people often die coz of the treatmment circumstances...not coz of havin developed cancer....
this is one of the other facts known.....but nobody talks about that issue coz it doesn't disturb to get out of those poor thingies the last and latest shekelchen.....!!!(scared)(constipated)(dead)(mad)(dead)
sorry for my explosion.... :B :B :B
but I do have several of those clients and I think this new
form of *cellsymbisoe therapy* might become one of the positive options soon.
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:59am; Reply: 6
Quoted Text
This makes a lot of sense because cancer has the ability to change to meet varying changes in the body.  The only disease agent that we know of (virus, bacteria or fungus) that has this ability is fungus.  Unless there is some other agent discovered, fungus must be the base for cancer.  

When I asked my practitioner about this, she said that she had just studied about this and that it was correct.
It definitely raises some interesting questions...
Posted by: Lola, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 7:05am; Reply: 7
http://www.dadamo.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?m-1219512695/s-13/#num13
C Sharp makes an interesting point here....
Posted by: Dr. D, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 11:14am; Reply: 8
Without me having to listen to the whole thing (interest, but no time)...

What does he say?

Sounds like Hulda Clark except with her it was parasites..
Posted by: Lola, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 3:26pm; Reply: 9
he believes all cancers have a fungal basis.
and can be zapped with baking soda washes.
Posted by: 815 (Guest), Sunday, August 24, 2008, 3:40pm; Reply: 10
Quoted from Amazone I.
yep Mayflower, but he was the  victim of himself and now gives advices for foods and supps. for cancer preventions... but what I really dislike is, that always Peter's advices..given decades before (and of course also other valide options


I'll tell you this Isa, if I get cancer, I'd refuse radiation, and the only doc that's going to treat me is Dr. D.

Posted by: Dr. D, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 5:35pm; Reply: 11
Quoted from Lola
he believes all cancers have a fungal basis.
and can be zapped with baking soda washes.


I hope he is right...
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:17pm; Reply: 12
Quoted Text
Without me having to listen to the whole thing (interest, but no time)...

What does he say?

Sounds like Hulda Clark except with her it was parasites..
He says that cancer is actually white in appearance, and is essentially massive candida overgrowth with an interior stalking region and an exterior region, and that he gets at the stalk with a catheter of sodium bicarbonate, which he claims is the most potent anti-candida substance there is.
Posted by: Dr. D, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:40pm; Reply: 13
Very tenuous argument indeed. However that does not preclude it working via some other mechanism.  :)
Posted by: Andrea AWsec, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:51pm; Reply: 14
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tenuous ;)
Posted by: Lola, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 6:57pm; Reply: 15
one 'other mechanism' definitely working is the fact that s. bicarbonate keeps my teeth looking fairly white!! ;)
Posted by: Amazone I., Sunday, August 24, 2008, 8:12pm; Reply: 16
Dr. David Servan-Schreiber describes merely all cancers as mostly of the *virulent types*....(eek)but I guess that he refers more to the action than of its forms...so he describes par example:
-maligne lymphoma  = from heliobacter pylori
-bronchial carcinoma = siliciuoxide,asbest and smoke
-mesotheliom =asbest
-esophagus cancer= barrett-syndrom
-liver cancer= hepatitis B & C
-stomach cancer = heliobacter pylori
-Kaposi sarcom= human herpesvirus Type 8
-cancer of the bladder = bilharziose
- colon-ca.= chron. inflammation of the gut and colon
-uterus-ca =HPV ...human papillomavirus

so not one is found on the basic of fungii here...
so ...better not to belive but to get to know .... ;) ;D :D


Mayflower...nor would I.... I am persuated that preventive measurements and herbs and orthomolecular treatment will do
all I'd be in need of in such cases .... :)
btw...also am I forced to act likewise coz of my superbe adverse reactions of nearly all kinds of chemical medication...
:-/(constipated)(shrug)and if I'm honest...it even won't bother coz I am very faithful in complementary medicine... ;) :D......in BTD and all its lovely and effective interactions of adaptogenics, & supplements.(clap)(dance)(smarty)(kewl)
and something else....here we mustn't forget the *healing mushrooms*......(woot)(smarty)(whistle)
Posted by: C_Sharp, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 8:18pm; Reply: 17
I recently posted a note on Radium in Drinking Water and Osteosarcomas in the water filter thread.
Posted by: Ribbit, Sunday, August 24, 2008, 10:21pm; Reply: 18
A good friend of mine (a nurse) was recently diagnosed with breast cancer.  It was only in the beginning stages and could hardly be called cancer yet, they said.  But instead of any treatment, she opted to have a double masectomy "just in case" the cancer developed further.  Next she had her ovaries out because the dr said they produced too much estrogen.  A mutual friend of ours read all about this baking soda treatment and was so excited about it, but my nurse friend couldn't get her mind around anything that sounded so foreign.

When I went 10 years ago to have the VegaTest done, he said I had a massive Candida overgrowth in my uterus and cervix. :B  I didn't have a "yeast infection" per se.  But he said it was so bad he wanted me to go have a pap test done to make sure I wasn't developing cervical cancer.  I reluctantly went, and all was clear, but it did give me a scare.  His homeopathic remedies helped some.
Posted by: 815 (Guest), Sunday, August 24, 2008, 11:28pm; Reply: 19
Quoted from Amazone I.
Mayflower...nor would I.... I am persuated that preventive measurements and herbs and orthomolecular treatment will do all I'd be in need of in such cases .... :)
btw...also am I forced to act likewise coz of my superbe adverse reactions of nearly all kinds of chemical medication...
:-/(constipated)(shrug)and if I'm honest...and something else....here we mustn't foret the *healing mushrooms*......(woot)(smarty)(whistle)


Isa (hugegrin)I'm glad you agree! My body is the same way.
I'm wondering if it comes from my AB dad's side? My mother had no allergies or sensitivities..She never even had colds when I was growing up. I think she was a Teacher. One thing is I don't like mushrooms. :P I'll take the healing ones if I have too

After reading Ribbit's post, I'm wondering if I should stop the soy powder... :-/  
Posted by: mikeo, Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:03am; Reply: 20
Quoted from 815


I'll tell you this Isa, if I get cancer, I'd refuse radiation, and the only doc that's going to treat me is Dr. D.



Dr D in talks and lectures he's given on Cancer and blood types would recommend radiation and chemo especially if you're an A or AB. My guess is he puts all his A and AB patients (or any patients with a family history of cancer) who come through his door on cancer prevention protocols and with patients with cancer he would suggest protocols and diet so the chemo and radiation do better jobs of eradicating the cancer with less after effects.
Posted by: Amazone I., Monday, August 25, 2008, 6:03am; Reply: 21
(eek)(oh)(eek)(oh)(eek)(shy)(dead)with all I saw dearest mikeo
I still would opt for no radiation and no chemo !!!
A friend of mine in Austria got breastcancer...the only thing she did till now is following AB diet and takes her supplements
and is followed well by an ND.......she is still alife after 8 years of that diagnosis....


and I feel someties people happy to get shnippled off....just here and there a little and then they are just off.... :P :(
perhaps the only form to feel ourselves??)....
Posted by: Andrea AWsec, Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:26pm; Reply: 22
Every case is different. Some cancers are very aggressive and need all the treatments from every angle to eradicate them.

It is a big burden for doctors to have patients rely on "them" solely for cure. I imagine Peter has felt this more then once.
(I know he has a magic wand some where in his office ;))
Posted by: 1323 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:30pm; Reply: 23
Well in early 2003, my  2nd husband got head and neck cancer.  He had surgery and we immediately put him on the type A diet and I was emailing Heidi a lot at that time asking for suggestions.  

He then started radiation and the only reason he kept his weight on was that I was making him drink down the vegi and fruit shakes with tofu and soy and take his type A supp's from NAP.  I even went on a trip and made him all his shakes and soups in advance so he could stay on the BTD eating regime while I was gone.

We did everything we thought to do according to the LR4YT book and he still passed away in early 2004. He went downhill slowly over the year despite all efforts, and never got better.

We also tried all the 'out there' therapies as much as we knew ... remember that electric treatment you could give yourself?  We ordered one of those and he did that as well..

So, one has to come to the place where 'it was his time.'  At first from my pain, I got mad at the diet and also at all the people who had survived cancer because we had tried as hard as many others to help him to live.  And then I had to come to that statement... "It must have been his time, and other forces were at work."  

He left me with many gifts of compassion in my heart helping him die and humbled me greatly on many fronts.  His death is still a great teacher.

So in my book, yes try everything you can when you or a loved one gets sick with this because there are always miracles whether it's backing soda or other seemingly crazy techniques.  And even if you think they are going to live because by God you are not going to let them die, don't let one moment slip by that you don't spend quality time doing things together and sharing important thoughts and feelings.  For me, the things I didn't do and say became knives in my heart after he was gone.

I also know that his cancer came on from some extreme stress he was going through at the time.  It was obvious. So another thing is to keep the stress down as much as you can.  

I'm not an expert by any means just sharing my experience.  
Posted by: Dr. D, Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:38pm; Reply: 24
Hey Funky..

Nicely done.
Posted by: yaman, Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:54pm; Reply: 25
Funkymuse,

Thank you for that post! Not only touching, but also truly teaching.

Thanks again,
Yaman
Posted by: 1323 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 2:20pm; Reply: 26


Dr. D, Yaman... thank you kindly for your comments!  Never thought you'd chime in Dr. D!  One never knows when you are lurking!    ;D

From my experience, we learn best from telling our stories to one another.  That is something that is greatly lacking in our society I feel.  And it comes much from the older people/Elders being cast aside in a large part by media and youth.  And youth can't help it, they follow the media for the most part.  

Anyway... before I get on another tirade, I will shut up and let this thread continue on it's cancer path.  ::)  :o  :X  :)  
Posted by: Lola, Monday, August 25, 2008, 2:27pm; Reply: 27
FM,
you did your best.....anyone in your position would certainly do the same, or to the best of their ability.
thanks for sharing this powerful testimonial with us all!
Posted by: 1323 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:08pm; Reply: 28
Quoted from Lola
FM,
you did your best.....anyone in your position would certainly do the same, or to the best of their ability.
thanks for sharing this powerful testimonial with us all!


Thanks Lola... one never knows how they are going to react when a loved on gets ill or even ones own body.  It's a trying time and brings out our strengths and weaknesses all at once.  But we do the best we can and if we are unable to do certain things, I would hope a team of support would come in to assist.  That's really what we humans do best.. is help one another... as greatly evidenced by this board.  :)
Posted by: Kristin, Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:37pm; Reply: 29
Thank you Funkymuse, for sharing your story with us. I was going to post something in a similar vein, but you said it much more eloquently than I ever could have.

And I agree that telling our stories is one of the most powerful tools for healing and wholeness... both for the teller and for the listener.
Posted by: 815 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:53pm; Reply: 30
Quoted from Amazone I.
(eek)(oh)(eek)(oh)(eek)(shy)(dead)with all I saw dearest mikeo
I still would opt for no radiation and no chemo !!!


Isa, I agree with you 100%. I guess that would be where Dr. D and I would lock horns. My mother had a brain tumor..First she had surgery for removal of the tumor, and then she got  radiation and chemo, after I begged her not to.  When she died a year later, the doctor told my sister that the cancer never came back after the surgical removal and that the radiation killed her. No thank you on radiation and chemo. Just my HO.

Sorry about your husband funkymuse..:(
Posted by: pixelland, Monday, August 25, 2008, 4:09pm; Reply: 31
Does anyone know of a case where chemo/radiation helped?
My father's cancer was too far along, so they didn't try it. Of my two aunts... one opted for the treatments and suffered greatly from them, the other did not. Both died from the cancer in about the same length of time from diagnosis.

I understand the science is constantly being refined, and that there are new treatments that are more specifically targeted.... and that each case is different....

But I don't recall any cases where the treatment cured the cancer without destroying the health of the patient in the process... Has anyone taken these therapies and survived with any quality of life?
Posted by: Amazone I., Monday, August 25, 2008, 6:50pm; Reply: 32
ahem... :P :B :B......that's what I was mentioning.... :-/ :o :B

sorry this might be cruel... but also my advaita teacher told me once.... Isssssaaaa...if you believe in Karma...so ther's Karma...but if you don't believe in Karma...so there's no Karma....
ahem yessss.... what shall.. should I've had to believe.... :o :-/ :-/ :B....
I am sure that our mind can do much more for us that we can/will be able to imagine right now.... (lurke for the L.Hay's issues' as
well !!  ;) :D :)) but not negelect your body needs!!! And no institution can tell you what your body needs in certain circumstances....!
:K) from Isa
Posted by: Maria Giovanna, Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:24pm; Reply: 33
Hi I remember a  young ( 29 years old) Sicilian lady from Taormina, she went to my father, an oncologist, pregnant and with poor hopes to survive to give birth  to her baby beacuse of  a Hodgkin Lymphoma, according to the Italian and German center where she had looked for help.
She received a soft treatment not to harm her baby and gave birth to a healthy baby girl, married the father of her daughter and is still healthy today  with a 8 years granddaughter, beautiful as she is.
A frend of me had a breast cancer with her second child a daughter 3 years old and received conventional surgical and chemioterapic treatment four year ago. She is working in a wonderful cultural fiundation and follow well  her family with tw chidren and an husband.

Radiotherapy is no more always golden standard for breast cancer  so you can refuse it wisely in most cases, but chemotherapy has saved nearly all Hodgkin lymphomas, the most of children leukemias and  a good number of breast cancer, the most if early detected.
Chemotherapy was one of the greatest advancements in tumors treatment of the last fifty years and  we'd just need such advancements to beat cancer, when it has overwhelmed our immune system. To prevent and to heal the damages and to avoid relapses and metastasis in the long run after or together with conventional treatment I just trust Dr D.
If I had a cancer not detected in the earliest stadium I'd try a good convetional oncology center, as I could discuss with the doctors and refuse treatments no more useful or without the best results, as really if I had just some months of life and not best hopes from a treatment, I'd choose  just pain management too.
I remember  the first children treated successfully  for leukemia playing on the stairs of my father workplace, as there was not yet a pediatric oncohematology unit 35 year ago.
Please believe it is just  that in every job the best are few, but look for the best oncologists, if you have a full blown cancer, as Dr D. says !
Maria Giovanna ( may be oncologist today if my father would have been familistic and authoutarian !)
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:56pm; Reply: 34
I would say that, as far as stress being a contributor to cancer goes, this has, in my eyes, become an exponentially more treacherous and rotten world during just my lifetime, and people who just can't fit into that piggish dynamic seem to have a harder time of things.

It's very, very hard to live in the world today and, contrary to popular dismissals to the contrary, I really don't think life has ever been quite this stressful and treacherous before.  If stress is a major player in cancer, I'm not surprised to see cancer on the upswing.
Posted by: Dr. D, Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:18pm; Reply: 35
Interesting day. I went into the office as a favor to see an ND who is battling gliobastoma brain cancer. In the course of the discussion his wife mentioned that another naturopath, John McMahon, died this February from colon cancer. Dr. McMahon, some of you might remember, wrote that criticism of the BTD, calling it a scam, etc. He was a vegan, and like some sort of super athlete or whatever. He was type O and 50 years old.

He preceptored with me and my father many years ago when I was first out of school and he and his wife were still students, and until I read that negative review I would have thought that we were friends. The office he shared with his wife is a quarter mile down the road from my clinic.

This has certainly left me somewhat twisted up.  I hope that wherever he is he has found some happiness and peace. :-/

  
Posted by: Ribbit, Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:31pm; Reply: 36
Oh, Dr. D [hug]... We love you.
Posted by: 1323 (Guest), Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:31pm; Reply: 37
Who is the famous bicycle guy who beat cancer?

Didn't he have chemo and radiation?  I couldn't finish reading his story because it bit my heart that he survived and my man didn't.  I know it was mean, but I was fresh from the death and threw the book across the room.   :B
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:19am; Reply: 38
Quoted Text
He preceptored with me and my father many years ago when I was first out of school and he and his wife were still students, and until I read that negative review I would have thought that we were friends. The office he shared with his wife is a quarter mile down the road from my clinic.

This has certainly left me somewhat twisted up.  I hopeSorr that wherever he is he has found some happiness and peace.
Sorry to hear of your loss.  It's always just painful to lose both friendship and friends.  
Posted by: Ribbit, Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 1:29am; Reply: 39
Something Armstrong.  Armstrong?  Is that his name?
Posted by: ABJoe, Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 2:39am; Reply: 40
Quoted from 1323
Who is the famous bicycle guy who beat cancer?


Lance Armstrong...

I'm not sure what treatment protocol he followed except that he did lots of riding during the recovery.
Posted by: Mrs T O+, Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 2:49am; Reply: 41
FM:  Perhaps your husband's cancer was too far along. But I bet all that good care & diet made that last year so much more comfortable!
Dr D.:  So sorry to hear of the loss of a friend & the sadness of his critcism of the diet.  It seems that vagetarian Os can be pretty stubborn.
Thank you for your work. Even the sad losses vindicate the diet. I see that a lot.
Mrs "T"  
Posted by: 521 (Guest), Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 5:01am; Reply: 42
I imagine that the worst thing vegetarian O's do, is that they eat wheat and corn products, because they're plant-derived.  

I suppose the not eating meat is not nearly as bad, on its own, as eating the wheat and corn products... especially if that also meant avoiding dairy.

But God help this guy if part of his definition of "non-meat" is dairy, and if he's eating no meat whatsoever, but indiscriminate amounts of wheat, corn, and dairy products, because he's some variant of "vegetarian".

I shudder to think of it.  It's the precisely perfect formula for total disaster... the direct antithesis of a proper "O" diet.

They say you can judge a tree by the fruit it bears... so I suppose the fruit of an obstinate tree that refuses to question its beliefs might, regrettably, be death.
Posted by: 1323 (Guest), Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 1:01pm; Reply: 43
Quoted from ABJoe


Lance Armstrong...

I'm not sure what treatment protocol he followed except that he did lots of riding during the recovery.


The beginning of the book talks about how harsh his treatment was and how he could barely function... so I'm sure it must have been further along in the treatment!   :-/

He's a great poster man for cancer and hope is very very important for those facing long term recovery even if the Doctors still don't know much which is what the Doctor told my friend Laurie (who was there to help me with my husband and who had lost her song after a 2 year cancer battle).  She cornered him and he admitted that they still don't know much about this disease.
Posted by: Ribbit, Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 1:14pm; Reply: 44
I guess they don't read the alternative stuff.  There's plenty out there.
Posted by: wanthanee, Friday, November 9, 2012, 10:21pm; Reply: 45
:D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1fumAO0t0k&feature=endscreen&NR=1


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFqgCwjtVho
Posted by: PCUK-Positive, Saturday, November 10, 2012, 12:16am; Reply: 46
Isn't lance Armstrong the alleged biggest cheat in cycling.

Eventually the buck stops.
Posted by: AKArtlover, Saturday, November 10, 2012, 1:59am; Reply: 47
stress and cancer?
http://germannewmedicine.com/documents/gnm_articles___introduction.html
Posted by: Amazone I., Saturday, November 10, 2012, 7:53am; Reply: 48
I never saw any ca-client capable to go for such sports while being in a conventional anti-cancer-treatment..sorry here begun the fake but no-one remarked it at time...amazing amazing how silly we all can be by times ;) ;D..... :X
Posted by: DoS, Saturday, November 10, 2012, 11:59pm; Reply: 49
Fungus is actually smarter than cancer. Cancer isn't a network of neuron-awareness. In fact if I understand it, it is about the dumbest tissue ever. It doesn't evolve. Again if I get it, cancer is just confused transcriptions of unnecessary mass growth. The relation seems to be that it is opportunistic. It is always willing to send confused transcriptions in order to keep going; the definition of cancer being unwarranted cell growth that repeats itself for no apparent reason other than the information says to do it again. Cancer, doesn't have the incentive for self replication for existence; it isn't that smart. It is more target-able than things that do. But it is very dangerous because it is large, large like growth of tissue, organs, skin, etc. It also doesn't necessarily appear as a foreign invade since it has mostly your original DNA.

Dr. D'Adamo's treatment approach. First improved immune system. Next is providing good nutrients needed for proper cell-replication (functions of histone formulation, and methylation). Also factors of preventing interference for those susceptible (heavy metals, bacteria, misplaced sugars, etc). The teacher diet advocates consuming a lot in order to get necessarily nutrients, while doing a lot aid the immune system to not have to deal with rather small issue and actually concentrate on the big boys like cancer. (at least as it appears to me)

Maybe my understanding isn't what I think it is, but the only thing needed for cancer is a lowered surveillance system that allows the circumstances that 'feed' an undesirable action. Once the transcription is off in the original cell, reaction to the marginally-off RNA transcriptions that maybe lack histone foundation or straight up have inappropriate methylation - lack of foundation, lack of nutrients, or too much interference? my guesses, probably different between phenotypes - has a re-occurring affect to designed replication while de-designating place/replacement. It can be confused enough to send packages that can spread through the body instead of localized growth. The danger is lack of intent in the cancer (it is stupid, and evolutionarily speaking worthless towards self-survival tactics as it doesn't gain preference via replication avenues).

I just read this .

Is this fellow onto something? Well perhaps, but not in the way he believes? What if his approaches are preventing the randomized spread and not specifically "attacking" or acting as strong enough polarized chemical reactions in order to destroy cancer. Also it might scrub out some of the precursors.

Honestly the color thing doesn't mean much because the cells are un-designated, purposeless, mass that often doesn't even stick together. Don't think he is onto anything here.

RNA confusion? Does fungus feeding on sugars on a cell, become invasive during replication where perhaps the cell is vulnerable to take on characteristics of the fungus (continued replication, but nothing else). I don't he is onto anything here.

*His argument is antithetical, actually. Cancer isn't hard to kill AT ALL. The problem is not killing the human at the same time. Fungi on the other hand is likely to adapt to most treatments. We are currently fighting side effects to treatment more than cancer it seems; the goal being to find something we survive and it does not.

*Alleviating the immune system from the problems aside from cancer would allow the body to actually have enough of the immune system left over to attack cancer.

*Symbiotic relationships are likely between cancer and fungus. Fungus is opportunistic and evolves. Why wouldn't it live around cancer? If the immune system is over-run or not providing the function it should, fungus is likely to to take advantage of this as we know. Especially if cancer provide a rich environment for food to be caught in for the fungus.

*People with candida problems don't necessarily have cancer, or are not likely too necessarily. That makes a hard claim that cancer is fungus, as opposed to symbiotic.

*The symbiotic relationship would dissipate once the food is gone. Perhaps Fungus increases the size of cancer tumors and increased the pressure in order to break off bits of replicating cells to spread to other parts of the body. If you treat the fungus you have a large hollowed type structure as opposed to a fortress of resisting and evolving fungus. This isn't an elimination of cancer in itself but rather something an immune system could stand a chance against.

*The more I read, the more I believe the immune system needs to deal with most problems we see as being the axis-of-evil type stuff, is just temporary alleviation from other duties under a premise of a manageable load (the immune system regenerating faster than the designated hostile). For this reason I honestly believe virus curing is going to be easy once it gets approached in this manner also discussed in my post about viruses - that apparently was really not interesting.

Not that I have any formal education on this... It just seems like a few simple Google searches can let a person quickly understand how things are never so simple.
Posted by: maukik, Monday, November 12, 2012, 1:11am; Reply: 50
Quoted from AKArtlover



Fascinating. Thanks for posting, AKA.

Posted by: Dianne, Monday, November 12, 2012, 2:45am; Reply: 51
Quoted from maukik



Fascinating. Thanks for posting, AKA.



I believe that this is what Isa (Amazone) mentions quite frequently on the boards. I read this years ago and Dr. Tulio Simoncini's work is fascinating as well.  :)

Posted by: DoS, Monday, November 12, 2012, 6:33am; Reply: 52
I feel sorry for Dr. D having to be surrounded by the pseudo stuff people just eat up like mad. Funny how so much of it has correlations but people advertise them like causations.
Posted by: maukik, Monday, November 12, 2012, 7:40pm; Reply: 53
Quoted from DoS
I feel sorry for Dr. D having to be surrounded by the pseudo stuff people just eat up like mad.  


To what pseudo stuff are you referring?


Posted by: maukik, Monday, November 12, 2012, 7:42pm; Reply: 54
Quoted from Dianne


Dr. Tulio Simoncini's work is fascinating as well.  :)



Yes, I have read his theories in the past.

Posted by: DoS, Tuesday, November 13, 2012, 1:45am; Reply: 55
Quoted from maukik


To what pseudo stuff are you referring?




A lot of stuff. Basically anything that is over simplified - like food colors.
Posted by: Amazone I., Wednesday, November 21, 2012, 11:37am; Reply: 56
perhaps a good idea to implement this product in all cancer therapies ??) !!!


http://www.ukrin.com/en/physiciansonukrain      



(eek)(smarty)(clap)(ok)(dance)
Print page generated: Friday, July 25, 2014, 3:57pm