Print Topic - Archive

BTD Forums  /  Live Right 4 Your Type  /  Rh- issues
Posted by: macawluver, Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 7:18pm
I was wondering if anyone knows if being RH- is considered overall to be a disadvantage from a health stand point? While reading the Blood Type Encyclopedia, I noticed that there are several bacterial and viral diseases that being RH- greatly increases your risk. As far as bacterial goes, being RH- puts you at greater risk of contracting Tuberculosis and Typhoid. On the viral side, Mono and Mumps are more likly to affect RH- people.

On the other side of things though, as far as cancer is concerned, I understand that some studies have put RH- people at an advantage as far as their immunity in that they have found a higher natural NK cytotoxicity against target cells.
Posted by: KimonoKat, Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 7:38pm; Reply: 1
That's interesting. I missed those points in the Encyclopedia.

All I know is that my diet is a bit more like a nonnie because of my Rh status.  Less grain, more protein servings.
Posted by: shells, Saturday, December 30, 2006, 12:58pm; Reply: 2
Would like to know where you read about TB etc. for Rh-'s as there is someone in my family who was healthy and contracted this disease and is Rh- and I can see some little things in my siblings and children that are Rh- .These being naturally low blood pressure, nose bleeds in childhood but these could be some other genetic link. But I am curious ......

??) ??) :o
Posted by: Lola, Saturday, December 30, 2006, 5:19pm; Reply: 3;id=Rhesus_(Rh)_Blood_Group

there s much much more.....use your search button on the left hand side of the home page....
information on this site is endless!
Posted by: Victoria, Saturday, December 30, 2006, 8:38pm; Reply: 4
Information from Lola is endless!!  :-)  :-)  
Posted by: Lola, Saturday, December 30, 2006, 9:00pm; Reply: 5
It is all available here........all we need to do is get our fish rods and go fishing!!! lol
Posted by: shells, Sunday, December 31, 2006, 1:57am; Reply: 6
WOW - Lola .....thanks so much  :D

Looks like I'll be busy for quite a while !!   ;D
Posted by: Lola, Sunday, December 31, 2006, 2:34am; Reply: 7
anytime!  ;)
some links are quite scientific, so if questions arise, there will surely be someone to help you out.
Posted by: shells, Friday, January 5, 2007, 12:36pm; Reply: 8
If Rh- can make a secretor more like a noni, what does Rh- do to a noni?  ??) ??) ??)    :X
Posted by: Captain_Janeway, Friday, January 5, 2007, 2:14pm; Reply: 9
Quoted from shells
If Rh- can make a secretor more like a noni, what does Rh- do to a noni?  ??) ??) ??)    :X

My guess is that it would make them a super nonnie. By BTD principles rh neg makes no difference if one is A or AB as far as meat/fish servings are concerned,(I have never understood why this makes a difference for B'sand O's, but not for A or AB), but we are to decrease the number of starch/grain servings. My diet is nothing like the A nonsecretor diet due to rh neg and nonsecretor.
Posted by: Lola, Friday, January 5, 2007, 9:02pm; Reply: 10
an RH - is even more susceptible to grains.......and nonnies are, too........
Posted by: shells, Saturday, January 6, 2007, 4:23am; Reply: 11
Quoted from lola
an RH - is even more susceptible to grains.......and nonnies are, too........

So does this mean that an O Rh- secretor is the same as an O Rh- noni ?  ??)
Posted by: Lola, Saturday, January 6, 2007, 4:31am; Reply: 12
no.......not the same......but close when it comes to grains and frequency servings per week, which are 0-3  only........0 to me means none!!!lol
Print page generated: Thursday, March 22, 2018, 2:24am