This is a good teaching opportunity, since this is not just the point of view of Price Pottenger, but also to some degree or another, Atkins, Swank's Diet for MS, Neanderthin, and to a lesser degree the Zone and Protein Power diets.
So, actually, the title of this thread is pretty good: 'Soy Alert'
Type A's lack intestinal enzymes that break down dietary fats in an efficient manner.
But in most of these plans and websites everyone is advised to eat more fat.
Yet,
- Type A has more endothelial (artery wall) dysfunction than the other ABO types.
- They have 30% higher levels of factor VIII than other normal healthy blood types.
- They have higher levels of E-selectin on their artery walls than the other blood types.
- Their cholesterol in even healthy subjects is higher than the other types.
- Their blood clots more readily under stress than the other blood types.
Now,
- Factor VIII + elevated cholesterol + E-selectin = artery inflammation.
- Artery inflammation + platelet aggegation (clotting) = thrombus formation.
- Thrombus formation in heart or peripheral arteries =arterial, heart disease.
So it is not surprising that virtually every study looking at ABO types and heart/artery disease reports a majority of the cases to be type A. In the one study that showed a majority of type O, the authors retracted their results when upon further examination it was found that the type A's that should have been in the heart disease group were already dead.
A few years back Greg Kelly and I compiled all the studies we could find that looked at heart disease and blood type and calculated the total relative risk (RR) of getting heart disease by simply being type A. The RR was between 1.8 and 1.9, which means that your risk of heart disease simply by being type A was about double (180%-190%) that of those who were not type A.
Some interesting comparisions:
- RR of substantially elevated cholesterol and heart/artery disease: 2.25
- RR of substantially elevated homecysteine and heart/artery disease: 1.6-1.7
- RR of substantially elevated C-reactive protein and heart/artery disease: 1.8
Feel free to draw your own conclusions..
Type A also get a lot more 'A-like' cancers. Yet the Weston Price website is apoplectic about soy. Yet, not only does soy help the type A immune system locate A-like cancers, but soy is one of the foods that has repeatedly been shown to reduce the endothelial damage that type A is so prone to. High fat diets, on the other hand, increase endothelial damage.
A few years ago, a study came out that claimed that a link was discovered between Japanese men who ate soy and Alzheimers, remember? Well, that was taken up by the Weston Price people as if the Holy Grail had been found. Five years later and nobody has yet been able to come close to duplicating this one study, and now even the original author has doubts about its validity. That did not stop hundres of newspapers to run articles with headline like 'Will Soy Make You Stoopid.'
Then there was the tempest about soy and the thyroid. Soy does interact with thyroid function, in a raw form, in huge doses, in rats. Rat thyroid are glycosylated differently than human thyroids. In the case of rats, the lectin in soy did react with the thyroid. But no normal human is going to eat five pounds of raw soy beans daily, and even if they did, the evidence suggests that it would still only bother you if you had a transplanted rat thyroid in you.
However, there was one covert action on the part of the Price Pottenger people that did give me an insight into their nobility, or perhaps, lack of it. In a silly review of Eat Right For Your Type they went on and on about how lectins were nothing to worry about; just use their gelatin broth and all will be well. Yet, when they wrote about the soy/thyroid thing, they took great pains to alert the reader to the 'great dangers' of the 'dangerous lectins and hemmagglutins in soy.'
Like any one-size fits all diet, which tries to describe the elephant from one vantage point, it can have some applicability, and in the case of the Weston Price website, it is decent information for type Os and some non-secretors of other blood types, but it's over-extrapolated and offered equally to everyone else.
However, it would seem (unless one is completely paranoid) that
somebody must be getting the heart attacks and cancers that are fat-related and populate the medical literature.
Frankly, there are certain oils, such as coconut and palm, that I just cannot proclaim to be 'safe' for 'everybody'.
Finally, you can't just evaluate a food based on how it made you feel in the last half hour. Yes, there are allergies and intolerances, but often deeper knowledge tells us that there are sometimes more important things than subjective feelings. Flossing my teeth is not high up on the list of things that make me feel great. But deeper knowledge tells me that there is an advantage to doing it in the long term.
Maybe this seems disparaging, but they have some real questions to answer. The genomic revolution (and common sense) seem to indicate that no one diet will work satisfactorily in all people.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and there is always something to learn. This one is just mine.
Maybe we can archive this post/thread so I don't have to repost it again.