Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register


Main Forum Page  ♦   Latest Posts  ♦   Member Center  ♦   Search  ♦   Archives   ♦   Help   ♦   Log In/Out   ♦   Admins
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

BTD Forums    Lifestyle    Nonnie Clubhouse  ›  5 small EQUAL meals-no snacks?Opinions?Weightloss
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 2 Guests

5 small EQUAL meals-no snacks?Opinions?Weightloss  This thread currently has 901 views. Print Print Thread
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Goldie
Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 6:34pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

All Gatherer -70 Scorp/Sag on BTD/GENO 17 year
Sam Dan
Posts: 5,865
Gender: Female
Location: East Coast
I have come to the conclusion that maybe I (O'diabetic) should not even try to eat a snack but maybe the equivilant of 5 small but complete meals.  

I think the word SNACK is a misnomer for me. To me it indicates that it could possibly be sweet stuff, a treat of some sort.. NOT SO!

I can have a treat or some sweet stuff with a regular meal.. but not inbetween.

I think if I see a meal as a complete thing rather then some abstract then my body would be satisfied and I would not see such conflict about what to eat?

In the end it might allow me to lose some weight.  I think the body response to new ways of being fed allows for weight do be droped faster then other wise.  

anyone having ideas of their own?


Being here is invaluable, but not enough. We need ALL the Doctors. I needed them for a very small cancer spot-I could never feel!!! Please do your mammograms! Doing so saved me from cancer later on. I am grateful! Thanks for learning from my experience! I was lucky! I wish the same for YOU!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message
ruthiegirl
Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 7:30pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

SWAMI O+ Gatherer, Healing from Fibromyalgia
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 12,124
Gender: Female
Location: New York
Age: 42
To me, "snack" means a small amount of food when it's not mealtime. I don't think of "junk food" as being "snack food" at all. I also think of "snack" rather than "meal" when it's not eaten at the table with proper tableware. For example, if my son eats a "snack" of carrot sticks, cheese slices, and rice cakes (often while playing on the computer or watching TV) then I really don't care if he's too full for dinner, since he's consumed a balance of nutrients, even if it was in "snack" format.

I typically eat breakfast, lunch, mid-afternoon snack, then dinner. I've dropped the bedtime snack and the mid-morning snack. Occasionally, I'll have snack before lunch rather than after (snack at lunchtime then lunch at snacktime) but that's not my typical routine, and generally happens if I'm out and about when I get hungry and eat trail mix from my purse rather than a proper meal.

If the word "snack" makes you think of less healthy  food choices, then perhaps you'd do better thinking of it as 4 or 5 small meals per day, rather than 3 meals plus a snack or two. Just make sure your daily portions total what you should be eating (even if you end up having smaller portions of protein more often than SWAMI recomends- just look at total amounts.)


Ruth, Single Mother to 19yo   O- Leah , 18yo O- Hannah, and  12yo B+ Jack


Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 1 - 5
Amazone I.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 8:04pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh+ GT 4...E/..INTJ ....prop.=non-taster..
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 16,269
Gender: Female
Location: CH-Benglen Kanton Z�rich
Age: 56
this was merely thought for A's & AB's ....


MIfHI K-174
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 2 - 5
brinyskysail
Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 8:17pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

explorer~FM~lactose, soy, grain free
Ee Dan
Posts: 1,229
Gender: Female
Location: Bedford, PA
Age: 25
Quoted from Goldie
I have come to the conclusion that maybe I (O'diabetic) should not even try to eat a snack but maybe the equivilant of 5 small but complete meals.  


I think this sounds like a good idea.  The more complete each of your meals is, the more satisfied you'll be, and you'll be less likely to want something sweet or noncompliant.  If calling it a "snack" causes you to eat "incomplete" or "bad" then I think it would be a good idea to switch to refering to all eating times as "meals".  Even if you eat the same amount as you would for a snack, refering to it as a meal makes it sound more complete and wholesome.  The brain can do some tricky things so altering your thinking might be what you need.

I'm not trying to lose weight (gain, actually), but I know that for me if I don't include all macronutrients in a meal or snack it causes me to get all messed up and I end up eating something ridiculous later.  If I have well-rounded meals I'm satisfied, don't go crazy later, and - most importantly - I feel better

Hope this helps


There is a good in every bad  
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 3 - 5
Goldie
Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 9:49pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

All Gatherer -70 Scorp/Sag on BTD/GENO 17 year
Sam Dan
Posts: 5,865
Gender: Female
Location: East Coast
YES I think you are all right..

its' in the single word that it matters.. and some food choices.. I will review more.. thanks..  


Being here is invaluable, but not enough. We need ALL the Doctors. I needed them for a very small cancer spot-I could never feel!!! Please do your mammograms! Doing so saved me from cancer later on. I am grateful! Thanks for learning from my experience! I was lucky! I wish the same for YOU!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 4 - 5
Kim
Friday, May 13, 2011, 4:38pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

SWAMI GT3 Teacher, Slight Taster
Ee Dan
Posts: 702
Gender: Female
Location: CO
Age: 60
Quoted from ruthiegirl
To me, "snack" means a small amount of food when it's not mealtime. I don't think of "junk food" as being "snack food" at all. I also think of "snack" rather than "meal" when it's not eaten at the table with proper tableware. For example, if my son eats a "snack" of carrot sticks, cheese slices, and rice cakes (often while playing on the computer or watching TV) then I really don't care if he's too full for dinner, since he's consumed a balance of nutrients, even if it was in "snack" format.

I typically eat breakfast, lunch, mid-afternoon snack, then dinner. I've dropped the bedtime snack and the mid-morning snack. Occasionally, I'll have snack before lunch rather than after (snack at lunchtime then lunch at snacktime) but that's not my typical routine, and generally happens if I'm out and about when I get hungry and eat trail mix from my purse rather than a proper meal.

If the word "snack" makes you think of less healthy  food choices, then perhaps you'd do better thinking of it as 4 or 5 small meals per day, rather than 3 meals plus a snack or two. Just make sure your daily portions total what you should be eating (even if you end up having smaller portions of protein more often than SWAMI recomends- just look at total amounts.)


Ditto.  You can call it a snack or a meal, either way it is food you need to get through the day.  I can't eat a lot at one sitting so I have to break up whatever I plan to eat for the day in 5-6 meals/snacks.  I can't eat after dinner either without seeing a rise in the scale.  Better to be prepared for a snack attack with something portable than to be hungry and tempted.
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 5 - 5
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Print Print Thread

BTD Forums    Lifestyle    Nonnie Clubhouse  ›  5 small EQUAL meals-no snacks?Opinions?Weightloss

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread