Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register


Main Forum Page  ♦   Latest Posts  ♦   Member Center  ♦   Search  ♦   Archives   ♦   Help   ♦   Log In/Out   ♦   Admins
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

BTD Forums    Diet and Nutrition    Live Right 4 Your Type  ›  Confused about Lewis...
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 5 Guests

Confused about Lewis...  This thread currently has 3,237 views. Print Print Thread
3 Pages 1 2 3 All Recommend Thread
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:08am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
I've never been able to make logical sense of a few things regarding the Lewis antigen status thing...

1) What, precisely, do Lewis antigens do, whether secreted or otherwise?

2) Are Lewis antigens measured through a blood test?  After all, if they were just measured with a saliva test, how would you be able to distinguish between a+b- and a-b-, when both would presumably still be bound on a non-secreted cell surface?

3) If one gene controls both Lewis antigen secretion AND blood type antigen secretion, then how is it possible that you could have a Lewis double-negative person who could also be either undetermined as a blood type secretor or non-secretor?  That seems like the action of an independent, though linked, gene or something...
Logged
E-mail E-mail
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:25am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Hi Ron,

I think your confusion arises from "secretion". The way I understand is, it is about whether the ABH antigens being secreted or not, and not about secreting Lewis antigens (I hope I didn't further complicate it).

Anyway, had you been a secretor, then you would be secreting your H antigen in your bodily fluids. You are a nonnie, so you are not able to do this.

The most accurate way of finding whichever you are is the saliva testing, i.e. looking for ABH antigens in one's saliva.

On the other hand, Lewis antigens can only be determined by blood testing. Lewis a+b- is always a non-secretor, and Lewis a-b+ is always a secretor, again the secretion here means that of the ABH antigens and not the Lewis antigens.

Lewis a-b- is a rare case, Lewis a+b+ being even rarer, and in both cases the Lewis typing does not say anything about secretor status. In such cases, it is best to have a saliva test done. Likewise, as you indicated, a saliva test won't tell you whether you are a Lewis a-b+ nonnie or a Lewis a-b- nonnie.

Cheers,
Yaman


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 1 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:30am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Actually, I did a google search, and I found an excellent graphic that I think cleared everything up for me:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=glyco.figgrp.1077

In the graphic, you'll see that there are two ways to test "positive" for the Lewis antigen, but only the top pathway is correlates with secretion. The second pathway from the top does not correlate with secretion, presumably because it's lacking that outer fucose molecule. However, it does test positive for Lewis antigenicity, because it does have that inner fucose molecule.

Apparently, here's the Dick Tracy Decoder Ring for Lewis antigenicity: the presence of an outer fucose correlates with secretion, while the presence of an inner fucose correlates with the ability to merely display antigenicity properties.

In the last two pathways, you'll see that the third pathway possesses that outer fucose, so it secretes... but, since it doesn't possess that inner fucose, it doesn't display antigenicity. To my understanding, this would be the example of that mysterious secretor who tests Lewis negative.

And, we are also told, there is one other way that a person could test Lewis negative, but be a non-secretor.  I think this is exemplified in the final pathway, in which no fucose molecules are tacked on at all.  In other words, since there is no inner fucose, it doesn't display Lewis antigenicity... and, since there is also no outer fucose, it doesn't secrete, either.  

And so, to sum it all up, I think that the four rows can be described as follows:

Top row:        a-b+
Second row:   a+b-
Third row:      a-b- (but blood type antigen secretor)
Fourth row:    a-b-  (but blood type antigen non-secretor)

Am I right about this?  Or is the top row an example of that extremely rare thing, the a+b+?
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 2 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:39am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
yaman,

Thanks for the info, but I'm still confused with how a person could secrete their blood type antigen, but be a Lewis double-negative, if both systems are controlled by the same gene.  Is there some special failure in blood type antigen secretors who do not also attach that outer fucose molecule, thus testing a-b+?  

I mean, if they're double-negative, there should be no way that secretion should happen, because the same gene that would attach that outer residue would also create a secretable product, automatically... thus making a double-negative always a non-secretor.

Now, if they're both controlled by the same gene, to my mind there should be some external influence going on that causes independence between the two systems.  But if they're not really the same gene, then I suppose they could operate independently somehow, and produce these results.

It's the seeming contradiction here that's driving me nuts.
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 3 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:40am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Ron! Brilliant!

Yes you are right, it's all about Se and Le which are responsible for locating the fucose. Thank you for showing it like that.

Now Le a+b+ is another question. For once you have the Se locus a1-2 FucT, then all a should be converted to b. The top pathway shown there is definitely Le a-b+. We have to look for a+b+ elsewhere I guess.

Cheers,
Yaman


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 4 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:44am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Here is what the article says about the Lewis graph I just posted:

Quoted Text
The Lewis A antigen (Lea) is synthesized by an α13/14 fucosyltransferase encoded by the Lewis (Le) blood group locus (Figures 16.15). The Lewis B antigen (Leb) is synthesized by the concerted actions of the Lewis α13 fucosyltransferase and the α12 fucosyltransferase encoded by the Se blood group locus (Figure 16.15). The nature of the alleles at an individual's Le and Se loci determines the complement of Lewis-active oligosaccharide molecules that will be constructed in that individual (Figure 16.15). Secretor-positive individuals convert type-1 oligosaccharide precursors to type-1 H molecules. The resulting type-1 H determinants may then be used as precursors by the Lewis locus-encoded α13/14 fucosyltransferase to form the Leb structure (Figure 16.15). Individuals that construct Leb exhibit the Le(a-b+) phenotype (Figure 16.15). Nonsecretors do not synthesize type-1 H determinants in secretory epithelia, but such unsubstituted type-1 molecules can be converted to Lea-active oligosaccharides by the Lewis α13/14 fucosyltransferase. These individuals exhibit the Le(a+b-) phenotype (Figure 16.15). Individuals that are homozygous for null alleles at the Lewis locus can have two different phenotypes. Such Lewis-negative individuals who are positive for secretor status construct type-1 H determinants, but these structures remain unconverted to Leb determinants (Figure 16.15). These persons exhibit the Le(a-b-) phenotype. In contrast, in individuals who are Lewis-negative nonsecretors, type-1 precursors are not substituted by either the Lewis or the Secretor fucosyltransferases, accounting for absence of Lea, Leb, or H structures, and their Le(a-b-) phenotype.


After really reading this carefully, it seems to describe the statuses I laid out initially... But, if this is really the case, what does an a+b+ look like?
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 5 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:49am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
OK, here's something I found:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/t1845m6323757338/

" We also show that Lewis epitopes on longer and/or more complex core chains appear to be predominant in the Polynesian Le(a+b+) samples. The formation of these extended glycolipids is compatible with the concept that in the presence of reduced secretor fucosyltransferase activity, increased elongation of the precursor chain occurs, which supports the postulate that fucosylation of the precursor prevents or at least markedly reduces chain elongation."

Seems it's about a reduced Se activity..


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 6 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:52am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Thanks, yaman.  I hope I've got it right.

If I've truly got it right, then my only question is:  What in the world does a+b+ look like, since the top pathway in the figure seems fully saturated with fucose residues on both the inside and outside?
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 7 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:53am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Here's another and more comprehensive explanation of Le a+b+:

http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/10/9/971/F1

In this case, Le enzyme activity is five times greater than Se enzyme activity, hence both Le a and Le b are present.


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 8 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:00am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Ohhhhh... waitaminute....  I think I understand now.  

An a+b+ might just be like an AB blood type:  it might be an example of somebody who produces BOTH nonsecreted Lewis antigens AND secreted Lewis antigens at the same time.

I think the whole point of the Lewis system, is that it's a discrete construct, kind of like binary switches... In theory, people either ONLY produce non-secreted Lewis antigen OR ONLY produce secreted antigen.

However, in some people, they might produce both.  In other words, their cells would perform the pathways of BOTH row 1 and row 2.

If I'm right, that means the binary classification of this system is a convenient conceptual abstraction, but not necessarily reality.

I say this because the article you posted, talks about two groups who were both a+b-, yet one was a nonsecretor, and the other was a partial secretor.  Apparently, the system is a good deal more "analog" than purely "binary" or "digital"... more "continuous" than "discrete".
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 9 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:02am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
I agree.. I think the mystery is solved now


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 10 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:03am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
In this case, Le enzyme activity is five times greater than Se enzyme activity, hence both Le a and Le b are present.


Yes, yes.  Thank you for saying that.  It all makes perfect sense now.  Apparently the Lewis "a" form doesn't secrete (and, I guess, correlates with blood type antigen non-secretion), but the Lewis "b" form does (and, I guess, also correlates with blood type antigen secretion).  
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 11 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:05am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
This raises another question in my mind:  I wonder if the ability to produce both A and B blood type antigens, might also be due to the same gene that allows someone to produce both Lewis a and b antigens simultaneously...

Actually, no, that wouldn't work, because the "a" form is always non-secreted, while the "b" form is always secreted.  And, with the "AB" blood type antigen, you can have both either secrete or non-secrete simultaneously.  So they don't even behave the same way...
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 12 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:07am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
You know, I think I might actually produce a visual graphic that also includes how an a+b+ is produced...  it would visually explain all five possibilities.
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 13 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:08am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Yep, that's the way I get it too.

And while we are at it, Lewis a-b+ patients with gastric carcinoma can exhibit an anomalous expression of Lewis a:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112687203/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

This gets deeper and deeper


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 14 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:11am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Quoted from Ronagon
You know, I think I might actually produce a visual graphic that also includes how an a+b+ is produced... it would visually explain all five possibilities.


Actually there is a graphic, you can find it by following the link in my post (reply 8-14)..


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 15 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:11am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Ah, well, I just clicked on that link, and they want me to pay to view it.  Ha ha ha ha  So I'll take your word for it.
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 16 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:17am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
Funny!,

OK, try this one, Figure 1, and it also shows how the secretion is effected:

http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/271/16/9830


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 17 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:18am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Okay, I went back and looked at that link.  Thanks again.

Strictly speaking, however, since the secreted form of Lewis, Lewis b, has both the inner and the outer fucoses, I would think it would register as both Lewis a AND Lewis b, thus making it a+b+... but I suppose what they mean when they talk about double-positive, is when Lewis is detected both on tissue surfaces, and out in fluids.

I guess I just think they need to be more precise in their terminology here.  It's ambiguous to me, and it caused my confusion.
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 18 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:23am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Ah. I see. I think.

So, would a+b+ result from a mixture of partial completions of the two-step, Se-Le Lewis "b" pathway, whereby sometimes it might stop after the Se enzyme does its thing, and other times it goes all the way through to the Le enzyme doing its thing, thus producing both "a" and "b" forms? Or does a+b+ come about from both the "a" AND the "b" pathways both being performed to full completion (and, perhaps, a partial completion of the "b" pathway here, too)?

You know, I'm really glad you posted that last link. It helps even more...

Revision History (1 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:24am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 19 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:26am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
My only complaint about that last diagram you showed, is that it gives the formula molecular diagrams, rather than a purely pictorial one, which would simplify things a lot more.

If you could represent the information in that last diagram, in the same visual manner as the very first diagram I posted, then that would make it clear as a bell to just about anyone, notwithstanding those in need of a neurologist.

Revision History (2 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:29am
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:27am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 20 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:29am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
The way I see it is; when Le activity is higher compared to Se activity, you end up with Le converting the Type 1 H (to Le b antigen), as well as some of the Type 1 precursor (to Le a antigen) before they had a chance to be converted to Type 1 H by Se due to Se's lower activity, so you end up with both antigens.

So actually, all you have to do is to put the top and the second pathways together in order to show the a+b+ case.

And I'm glad you started this thread, I had the opportunity to learn more about Lewis system


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah

Revision History (1 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:32am
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 21 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:31am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
The way I see it is; when Le activity is higher compared to Se activity, you end up with Le converting the Type 1 H, as well as the Type 1 precursor before it had a chance to be tackled with Se due to Se's lower activity, so you end up with both antigens.


Yes, but that's entirely the point of my last question:  Does a+b+ result from this way that you just described here -- in other words, from the cells performing both "Lewis a" and "Lewis b"pathways, or from the cells both partially and fully performing the "Lewis b" pathway only?
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 22 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:33am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
In other words, what you seem to just be describing is a situation whereby BOTH pathways are conducted.  But my point is that, what if the results happen from both full and partial completions of just the LEFT-hand pathway in the diagram?
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 23 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:37am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
My understanding is, both paths work simultaneously, it's just that more Le are at work than Se.


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 24 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:49am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Okay, I understand what you're thinking now. It just might be right.

But a different thought just occurred to me: When the "Se" enzyme produces that H type 1 antigen, is that just the secreted blood type O molecule? After all, it looks the same, right?  Does that set of pathways produce ALL blood type antigens, or only the secreted versions?

And if that's the case, is the non-secreted form, though identical, produced through the actions of a completely different gene at chromosomal site 9q34, rather than the secreted form, which is produced at either chromosome 11 or the other one? Is it really the case that both the secreted and non-secreted forms of all the various blood type antigens are chemically indistinguishable from each other, even though they're produced at two different chromosomal sites?

If so, that's pretty interesting.

Revision History (3 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:00am
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:54am
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:50am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 25 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:12am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
You know, after sifting through all these various diagrams, struggling through the published explanations, and talking this through with each you (which I'm very grateful to you for doing with me, by the way...), I've come to the conclusion that this was a very, very difficult and complicated pathway to grasp before we even started, and merely trying to describe it in words, is not nearly adequate.

To really make this clear, requires a full, pictorial diagram of some clarity and quality.

Revision History (1 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:14am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 26 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:22am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
The miracle of Life, is never simple Ron even though you have started with what at first glance seemed to have a simple answer.

Hopefully other minds will join this exciting thread..



"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 27 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:31am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
I've just been looking through this link for the book, "Essentials of Glycobiology", and it has some really amazing diagrams of all kinds of glycoconjugate molecules:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=glyco

In fact, there are a number of informative books at that website:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books

Revision History (1 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:33am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 28 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:48am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
And so, my final understanding here is as follows:

1) All secreted blood type antigens (A, B, and O), as well as Lewis antigens A and B, begin as "Type I" compounds.

2) This type I compound is added upon by the secretor gene, to create the to-be-secreted "H" antigen (also known as the "O secretor" antigen, which is, of course, secreted).

3) This to-be-secreted "H" antigen is added upon by the Lewis enzyme to create the Lewis "B" antigen, which is also secreted.

4) The original "Type I" compound (from "1)") can also be added upon by that same Lewis enzyme, to yield the Lewis "A" antigen, which is not secreted.

5) The "H" antigen (also known as the "O secretor" antigen, from "2)") can be added upon by the ABO gene at 9q34 to yield either an "A Secretor" or "B Secretor" antigen, which, as the names imply, are secreted.

6) In the case of the non-secreted blood types, the "H" antigen which is to be used as the base to build the non-secretor A's, B's, and O's, is made elsewhere, by some gene besides the secretor gene, though the structure will be identical. However, the ABO gene at 9q34 will still attach the "A" and "B" molecules to form the non-secretor "A" and "B", just as they did with the to-be-secreted forms.

If I've got this all right, I'm astonished... and a little relieved, at last.

Revision History (3 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:54am
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:52am
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:50am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 29 - 61
yaman
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 12:13pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; MN
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 2,772
Gender: Male
Location: Antigoni Island, Istanbul-Turkey
Age: 61
I'm afraid I have argue the point 1

In the first link you've provided above, it says that there are actually four typs of precursors to the ABO blood groups.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=glyco.section.1068


"You are never given a problem without the will power to solve it"
Richard Bach - Illusions, The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 30 - 61
Lola
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 8:59pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/mhc/xslcgi.fcgi?cmd=bgmut/systems_info&system=lewis
gosh guys, hope you reach a verdict!!
I m trying to learn something here!!! lol
http://www.dadamo.com/wiki/wiki.pl/Lewis_Blood_Group

Quoted Text
A Le(a+b+) phenotype may occur in individuals in whom the expression of H is decreased due to a mutation in the FUT2 gene (385A>T). This phenotype may also occur due to incomplete fucosylation of type H precursor sites. Failure to express FUT3 will result in a Lewis null phenotype [Le(a-b-)], irrespective of the Secretor status. However, one should note that the latter phenotype may also be observed upon the absence of Le glycolipids from the membrane, as may occur in patients with certain cancer or other conditions.

Quoted Text
Le(a+b+), is found in the Oriental population and appears to be due to a weak secretor gene.

Quoted Text
The le gene is an amorph. Persons who are lele produce no Lea and no Leb antigens. RBCs that type as Le(a+b+) are only rarely found when human antisera are used in typing. Such RBCs are seen more frequently when more potent monoclonal anti-Lea and anti-Leb reagents are used.

a rare bird!
http://www.dadamo.com/bloggers/ask/archives/00000234.htm


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!

Revision History (2 edits)
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:05pm
Ronagon  -  Thursday, August 16, 2007, 9:02pm
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 31 - 61
Ronagon
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:56pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
yaman,

Thanks for posting that.  I wonder if all those ABO variants still act as blood type antigens, in the same way.  Maybe they're created at different sites or something.



Lola,

Thanks for posting that.  I just realized that Dr. D has the same chart as was on that link yaman posted to me...
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 32 - 61
Lola
Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:05pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
right!


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 33 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 7:31pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from yaman
Lewis a-b- is a rare case,...

According to Dr. Kruzel in his 2003 IfHI presentation in the USA

Lewis a-b- = Whites 6%  Blacks 22%


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 34 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 7:49pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from Ronagon
I've never been able to make logical sense of a few things regarding the Lewis antigen status thing...

1) What, precisely, do Lewis antigens do, whether secreted or otherwise?

Lewis is not secreted, only ABO is secreted.
The secretor factor (Se) might be considered either a physiologic trait or an honorary blood group. The individual who is a so-called secretor has demonstrable ABH blood group antigen in the saliva and other body fluids; the nonsecretor does not. Secretor is dominant.

Genetically independent of the ABO blood groups is the secretor system which comprises two allelomorphic genes, Se which causes secretion in saliva and other fluids of the antigen or antigens corresponding to the individual's ABO group, and se which, in the homozygous condition determines non-secretion. Heterozygotes are secretors.


Quoted from Ronagon
2) Are Lewis antigens measured through a blood test?  After all, if they were just measured with a saliva test, how would you be able to distinguish between a+b- and a-b-, when both would presumably still be bound on a non-secreted cell surface?

According to Dr. Kruzel in his 2003 IfHI presentation you use 1 drop of anti-LeA or anti-LeB in two test tubes to check for agglutination of LeA and LeB, respectively. If you don't find any agglutination in either test tube then that would represent Lewis a-b-.

Quoted from Ronagon
3) If one gene controls both Lewis antigen secretion AND blood type antigen secretion, then how is it possible that you could have a Lewis double-negative person who could also be either undetermined as a blood type secretor or non-secretor?  That seems like the action of an independent, though linked, gene or something...

See answer to 1 above. Lewis and secretor are 2 different, but somewhat related issues.
The synthesis of the epitopes is dependent on the interaction of two different fucosyltransferases, products of two different loci: FUT2 or the secretor (Se) locus of the H/h blood group system that encodes the alpha (1,2) fucosyltransferase (FUT2), and the FUT3 locus that encodes the alpha (1/3,1/4 fucosyltransferase (FUT3).
...
Clearly, the genotype of an individual at the FUT2 and FUT3 loci determines the Lewis phenotype. In the presence of FUT2 alleles that express type 1 H determinants, the phenotype will be Le (a-b+), but individuals in whom the FUT2 gene is not expressed, it will be Le(a+b-). A Le(a+b+) phenotype may occur in individuals in whom the expression of H is decreased due to a mutation in the FUT2 gene (385A>T). This phenotype may also occur due to incomplete fucosylation of type H precursor sites. Failure to express FUT3 will result in a Lewis null phenotype [Le(a-b-)], irrespective of the Secretor status.

I suggest you read at least the whole introduction section of the article.


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 35 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 8:17pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from Ronagon
BOTH nonsecreted Lewis antigens AND secreted Lewis antigens at the same time.

I have already addressed the issue that secretor/non-secretor applies to ABH, not Lewis, in a previous post.



FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 36 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 8:19pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from Ronagon
And so, my final understanding here is as follows:

If I've got this all right, I'm astonished... and a little relieved, at last.

I think you need to go back and re-think all this.



FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 37 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 10:02pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from Ronagon
2) Are Lewis antigens measured through a blood test?  After all, if they were just measured with a saliva test, how would you be able to distinguish between a+b- and a-b-, when both would presumably still be bound on a non-secreted cell surface?

Here is a page that explains both the secretor saliva and Lewis blood testing procedures: DETERMINING SECRETOR STATUS


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 38 - 61
Lola
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 10:18pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
Quoted Text
The way I understand is, it is about whether the ABH antigens being secreted or not, and not about secreting Lewis antigens.

as Yaman also mentioned in the second post of this thread......


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!

Revision History (1 edits)
Ronagon  -  Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 10:21pm
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 39 - 61
Don
Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 10:44pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from lola

as Yaman also mentioned in the second post of this thread......

Yes, but Ron kept mentioning Lewis being secreted, so I thought it was worth repeating that secretor status applies to ABH being secreted, not Lewis.



FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 40 - 61
Lola
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 2:46am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
right Don!


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 41 - 61
Hannah2
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 4:44am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
I just received the results for the saliva test.. and  am happy with the secretor result.  I am confused about the suggestion to have confirmatory tests of Lewis blood group types.

I have read through  this thread  but I can't say I am any the wiser    
Is the saliva test as such  sufficient for me to tailor my diet around it, or are more tests needed?

The Lewis bit is new to me, and for some reason whatever I read about it, it doesn't seem to sink in..  funny sort of brain fog at the moment.

Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 42 - 61
Lola
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 4:51am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
saliva test is quite accurate!
no need to do a blood test.


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 43 - 61
Don
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:22pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from lola
saliva test is quite accurate!
no need to do a blood test.

Agree, but let me just add that there is no reason to do the Lewis blood test unless you are considering doing SWAMI, then you might want to find out if you are Lewis a-b-, since that is an optional input.



FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 44 - 61
Don
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:32pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from Hannah2
I just received the results for the saliva test.. and  am happy with the secretor result.  I am confused about the suggestion to have confirmatory tests of Lewis blood group types.

The saliva test is the best way to determine secretor status.
Quoted from Hannah2
I have read through  this thread  but I can't say I am any the wiser    

I am not surprised. Much of what was posted in this thread was confusing and not necessarily exactly correct information about the Lewis type system.
Quoted from Hannah2
Is the saliva test as such  sufficient for me to tailor my diet around it, or are more tests needed?

The saliva test is sufficient for now. However, for SWAMI you might want to consider some additional testing and once the new Genotype Diet book comes out we may find out that there are additional tests that will help to individualize our diets.
Quoted from Hannah2
The Lewis bit is new to me, and for some reason whatever I read about it, it doesn't seem to sink in..  funny sort of brain fog at the moment.

The wiki articles on the topic are good. If you haven't already, you might want to read them sometime.


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 45 - 61
Ronagon
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:59pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
I am not surprised. Much of what was posted in this thread was confusing and not necessarily exactly correct information about the Lewis type system.


Well, my purpose in starting this thread was to try and figure things out, starting from an openly-declared state of confusion. I even titled this thread to indicate that.

I'm not sure how else I'm supposed to learn this stuff without asking questions...

Revision History (2 edits)
Ronagon  -  Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 2:12pm
Ronagon  -  Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 2:11pm
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 46 - 61
Don
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 2:14pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Most definitely you get lots of points for discussing and trying to make sense of of it!


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 47 - 61
Lola
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 6:33pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
Quoted Text
there is no reason to do the Lewis blood test unless you are considering doing SWAMI, then you might want to find out if you are Lewis a-b-, since that is an optional input.


and once that turns up positive, like in my case, then you do want to be double sure with the saliva test, right Don?

still haven t gotten around to it...unbelievable!!

a friend of mine in Barcelona who does allergy testing is now implementing the lewis test in her lab, after I convinced her on the importance of determining secretor status for her patients!!!
but down here, am still looking for a lab to transform. lol
slow wins the race!
I m about to meet some lab colleges of hers here in Mexico city, interested in the lewis test implementation.......it s a process, but well worth it!


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 48 - 61
Don
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:22pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from lola
and once that turns up positive, like in my case, then you do want to be double sure with the saliva test, right Don?

still haven t gotten around to it...unbelievable!!

a friend of mine in Barcelona who does allergy testing is now implementing the lewis test in her lab, after I convinced her on the importance of determining secretor status for her patients!!!
but down here, am still looking for a lab to transform. lol
slow wins the race!
I m about to meet some lab colleges of hers here in Mexico city, interested in the lewis test implementation.......it s a process, but well worth it!

You should have done your spitting at the IfHI conference and shipped it from there, but I guess you didn't know you were a Lewis (a-b-) then and would still needed to confirm your secretor status with the saliva secretor test.

Good luck on your work with the labs. After you convince them to do the Lewis test then you can start working on them to do the secretor saliva test too.


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 49 - 61
Lola
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:29pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
will do!
thanks Don!
too bad SWCNM lab didn t have that option too when we were there.

which article or link would you suggest is the more accurate one to pass along to these people so they understand the science behind the importance of performing the lewis blood test together with the saliva test, too?

in order to get a perfect result....


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!

Revision History (2 edits)
Ronagon  -  Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:35pm
Ronagon  -  Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:34pm
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 50 - 61
Teresa S
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:54pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Warrior SWAMI
Autumn: Harvest, success.
Posts: 162
Gender: Female
Location: Barcelona (Spain)
Age: 57
Lola
I hope your friend could implement de Lewis test in Barcelona, the city where I live.  Is she also a BTD practicioner?
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 51 - 61
Lola
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 8:27pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
she specializes in allergy testing and is now trying to learn all she can on BTD from me!
I ll send you a pm with her email address so you can contact her.


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 52 - 61
Lloyd
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 9:57pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1 (Hunter)
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 7,342
Quoted from lola


and once that turns up positive, like in my case,


Some people can turn a negative into a positive.

Lola turns double-negatives into positives!!  

Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 53 - 61
Lola
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:36am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
purely mathematical!


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 54 - 61
Don
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 2:54am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh-, MN
Sam Dan
Posts: 7,189
Gender: Male
Location: North Alabama
Age: 59
Quoted from lola
which article or link would you suggest is the more accurate one to pass along to these people so they understand the science behind the importance of performing the lewis blood test together with the saliva test, too?

in order to get a perfect result....

How about these:
http://faculty.matcmadison.edu/mljensen/BloodBank/Lab_Manual/determining_secretor_status.htm

http://www.dadamo.com/knowbase/subtype/subtype2.htm

http://www.dadamo.com/wiki/wiki.pl/Secretor_Status


FIFHI; ISTP;
Started BTD 3/2002, with 2 O- secretor teenage sons
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 55 - 61
Lola
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 3:45am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
gracias Don!

how are your son s Spanish lessons going?
let him know I can help him anytime, if he needs it, ok?


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 56 - 61
lilith_bcn
Friday, August 15, 2008, 9:34pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh +; NN; Lewis a+ b-
Autumn: Harvest, success.
Posts: 123
Gender: Female
Location: Barcelona
Age: 39
What SWAMI means?




Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 57 - 61
C_Sharp
Saturday, August 16, 2008, 12:45am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Teacher Rh+ Lewis: a+b-, NN,Taster
Sa Bon Nim
Administrator
Posts: 8,575
Gender: Male
Location: Indiana
Age: 54
Quoted from lilith_bcn
What SWAMI means?


Swami is a computer program that generates a highly customized diet plan tailored to each individual. This software was written by Dr. Peter D'Adamo. The program perfoms 10 million individual calculations (considers 225 individual nutrient values found in each of 800 foods, matched to the results of of an individuals measurements and values-Blood type, secretor status, and many more) to create your personalized GenoType diet.

The SWAMI GenoType software harnesses the power of computers and artificial intelligence, using their tremendous precision and speed to help tailor unique one-of-a kind diets to individuals, based on their blood types, fingerprints, medical history, biometric measurements and over ninety other variables.

Dr. D and a few select people are using the software now. I believe it will be expanded to all IFHI certified practioners shortly.

In September, you will be able to use an online consumer version of the program without going to health care practitioner.


MIfHI                            I follow a SWAMI diet.
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 58 - 61
Lola
Saturday, August 16, 2008, 1:58am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT1; L (a-b-); (se); PROP-T; NN
Sa Bon Nim
Admin & Columnist
Posts: 51,445
Gender: Female
Location: ''eternal spring'' Cuernavaca - Mex.
Age: 58
http://www.4yourtype.com/level4.asp
SWAMI = Serotyping With Advanced Modifying Inventories


''Just follow the book, don't look for magic fixes to get you off the hook. Do the work.'' Dr.D.'98
DNA mt/Haplo H; Y-chrom/J2(M172);ISTJ
The harder you are on yourself, the easier life will be on you!
Logged
Private Message Private message YIM YIM Reply: 59 - 61
lilith_bcn
Saturday, August 16, 2008, 11:12pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Rh +; NN; Lewis a+ b-
Autumn: Harvest, success.
Posts: 123
Gender: Female
Location: Barcelona
Age: 39
Thank you, it's really impressive.




Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 60 - 61
David
Friday, December 23, 2011, 5:42pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Hunter - INFp-INFj-eNFJ
Autumn: Harvest, success.
Posts: 119
Gender: Male
Location: Texas
Age: 62
I just called a local lab and inquired about the Lewis Type Test. They quoted a price of $34.00 with results within 24-48 hours.


Thoughts Are Things... Think The Good Ones... and remember... Moderate exercise is the best mood elevator!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 61 - 61
3 Pages 1 2 3 All Recommend Thread
Print Print Thread

BTD Forums    Diet and Nutrition    Live Right 4 Your Type  ›  Confused about Lewis...

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread