I wonder at the History of Jared's strong "J" Judgement OR is it a sensativity. From what I've read, even Blood Type incorporates qualities of MB.
Observers have sought to understand the similarities and differences between individuals and groups of individuals by one category or by one type or another throughout all known history.
I read that a study in Japan showed Hunter's were usually S Types and it sounded like SJ's. I am clearly a NF type and enneagram 9. I have greatly enjoyed all my experiences participating in activities that are described as classic for A and B blood types. My mother was an A; so possibly I'm an Oa.
Thoughts Are Things... Think The Good Ones... and remember... Moderate exercise is the best mood elevator!
Socionics would work better with Blood type, as it incorporates physical traits.
Socionics is like the MBTI - it is also based on Jung's types. However, it is based on typing other people, you study how people form groups. That is even more compatible with blood typing, as it implies groups with physical traits would form together and become cohesive.
I seem to be an ENFj by socionics. It is like a cross between the ever kindly INFP with the ever ambitious ENTJ. In socionics, the ENFJ is called the EIE.
Explorer/ HSP-canary/ INFP/taster Early Spring: Awareness, desire.
Posts: 20
Location: North america
I have always been a loner at work. I don't go in to work to socialize or party or gossip. I enjoy a quiet work setting that gives me an apportunity to learn new things and utilize that knowledge OTJ. If there are a lot of co-workers that require much attention or social-give-and-take from me, they end up disappointed. I do like people, but I enjoy solitary learning and do-ing more than chatting and group-think.
Both my siblings (females) are this way, too. Both are type O-. However, one is a Teacher and the other is a Hunter.
Explorer/ HSP-canary/ INFP/taster Early Spring: Awareness, desire.
Posts: 20
Location: North america
zenphoenix, you are right....and I am the one who was confused. Both of them are a little taller than average. Both have long, narrow heads. Both are high energytypes that can go all day and seldom get tired. One, however, is very fine-boned and slender---and her energy is more the nervous type. The other, very large-boned sister is very well-padded and muscular (not chubby, just big) and has long-term sustained focused energy rather than nervous energy. The slender sister is a medical clerk and the bigger sister has her own catering business. Her ring-fingers are shorter than her index fingers, from what I can tell. The slender sister is more of a conventionl thinker. The big-boned sister is kind of wierd and off-beat.
Both are O-. Both have legs that are longer than torso. Both have legs with longer thighs than calves. For me, it's just a guess what their types are, bacause they will not submit to any in depth measuring and testing.
Based on this info what genotypes do they sound like?
I used to work as a group therapist at a mental health company. I think it was stressful for me and really put me outside of my comfort zone. I am a realistic and investigative person mainly, but pretty social as well.
Now i work for a home health care company. I read over notes and service plans to ensure they match up, review what areas are being addressed well and not being addressed well, and helping to ensure that clients are getting the care they need.
I love this job, because i am not working with people all day in an intimate way...i found it frustrating after awhile. Now i feel like i am working with a puzzle and making sure all the pieces fit, and like it.
I am half intro and half extro, but would much prefer to work alone like i do now with concepts and things, more than directly with people. I have others in my office, so i like that though.
Rh+ GT 4.....E/INTP ....prop.=non-taster.. Kyosha Nim Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 15,308
Gender: Female
Location: CH-Benglen Kanton Z�rich
a lot of O's might be ENF-types, remember it well, we do have a sort of%centage in I and-E-form
btw. no 5 in the enneagram is INTP/J and an intp is a 5/4... intj 5/6.... no4 is infp/j....please don't confond....
I observed a lot of A's might be ESTP/J'types but also confonded with no 1 =ENTP/J both lack the f-side ... but are vice versa integrative parts of the enneagram...
B's often might be 4'rs or eben 8ghts ... but something else might happen; it depends how somebody can jump into the enneagram.... some peeps are able to change their NT-sides with NF'parts.... btw... best are always SJ and SP types and NT and NF types....the typical 80/20 rule ....
aaaannnddd our all own terrible enemy is called *inveterateness*.... I saw a lot of people absolutamente impossible for them to change only a little bit or a little habit in their lives... crazy..crazy....as Don Miguel Ruiz mentioned it: all about our agreements...
Rh+ GT 4.....E/INTP ....prop.=non-taster.. Kyosha Nim Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 15,308
Gender: Female
Location: CH-Benglen Kanton Z�rich
hello everyone.... it's me again
it seems I was on the wrong way for integration ... I justamente made another approach and Dr. D. seems to be right for the explorers...we really seem to have more tendencies to be extravert... btw I always scored on teutonic tests no 5.... once it was intp and next intj for about 6 or 7 years and now what a surprise... but yup this description fits a bit better .....
I became a numer ONE in the enneagram... 1/9...wohooo ENTP newborn..... no more swiftings
zenphoenix, you are right....and I am the one who was confused. Both of them are a little taller than average. Both have long, narrow heads. Both are high energytypes that can go all day and seldom get tired. One, however, is very fine-boned and slender---and her energy is more the nervous type. The other, very large-boned sister is very well-padded and muscular (not chubby, just big) and has long-term sustained focused energy rather than nervous energy. The slender sister is a medical clerk and the bigger sister has her own catering business. Her ring-fingers are shorter than her index fingers, from what I can tell. The slender sister is more of a conventionl thinker. The big-boned sister is kind of wierd and off-beat.
Both are O-. Both have legs that are longer than torso. Both have legs with longer thighs than calves. For me, it's just a guess what their types are, because they will not submit to any in depth measuring and testing.
Based on this info what genotypes do they sound like?
wellll... the bigger-boned and padded looking sister is probably a gatherer. That is a common description of gathers - that they look "padded" even when a normal, healthy weight. I always think of Russell Crowe or Elvis when he was young... excellent examples of normal weight but padded looking. My niece is a gather, and she's an athelete, normal healthy weight, strong, but she looks padded, especially around her joints. You'd think with all running hse does she'd look supa-lean, but she doesn't.
the slender, fine boned, high/nervous energy sister... my guess would be hunter. My stepson is a hunter, and this describes him exactly. He's slender, and lean and lanky and just doesn't stop!!! Go go go, and if the energy isn't channeled properly, he gets weird and wired and twitchy.
That said, there is a possibility for either sister to be an explorer. If one or both have sensitivities to environmental stuff, or chemicals, or can't handle caffeine, or seems sort of hypochondriactish... explorer could be a possibility.
"Our lives are frittered away by detail. Simplify, simplify." ~Henry David Theroux
Explorer/ HSP-canary/ INFP/taster Early Spring: Awareness, desire.
Posts: 20
Location: North america
I just tried a search of this and got no results, but since it is related to what you said, zenphoenix, I will just mention it here. My older sister could be a Gatherer---are there mixed genotypes? Or is each person strictly one genotype? You mentioned that your niece is an athlete---I assume muscular. But the padding is a big clue that she is a Gatherer. Both my sisters and myself develop big muscles rather easily for females. That would have little bearing, then on genotype? Maybe this tendency toward muscularity is an unrelated genetic thing? It would not indicate a mixed genotype?