Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register


Main Forum Page  ♦   Latest Posts  ♦   Member Center  ♦   Search  ♦   Archives   ♦   Help   ♦   Log In/Out   ♦   Admins
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

BTD Forums    Diet and Nutrition    Eat Right 4 Your Type  ›  Definition of "Compliance"
Users Browsing Forum

Definition of "Compliance"  This thread currently has 7,368 views. Print Print Thread
5 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 » All Recommend Thread
Carol the Dabbler
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:58am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gluten-Free Raw-Food Vegan
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 2,774
Gender: Female
Location: Indiana, USA
Age: 69
Don posted this quote on another thread today:

Quoted Text

What is compliance?

  • If you are recovering from an illness or desire weight loss, then 80%-100% of your food choices should be highly beneficial.
  • If you are a healthy individual over the age of 55, 80% of foods should be beneficial.
  • If you are under 55 and healthy, 70% or more of your food choices should beneficial.
  • The remainder of your food choices should be neutral. Avoids should not be eaten.



The quote is from this site's FAQ's: http://www.dadamo.com/faq/smartfaq.cgi?answer=988813714&id=988813483.

This is a far cry from what I had thought was meant by the terms "compliance" or "70% compliant." How about the rest of you?



Carol

A+ nonnie married to an A+ secretor

Revision History (4 edits)
Lloyd  -  Saturday, November 30, 2013, 5:20pm
Lloyd  -  Friday, September 21, 2007, 1:39am
Marked for save.
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:10am
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:07am
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message
KimonoKat
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:04am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

38% HUNTER
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 4,661
Gender: Female
Location: Sherman Oaks, California
I think "compliance" can be what works best for you.  It may not be what's outlined by Dr. D, however, if it's working and you are feeling healthy, then, that's your compliance.

I would be considered 100% compliant to the basic diet of avoiding avoids.  I'm about 80-85% compliant to the Arthritis Health Library diet.  


Knowledge is power.  SWAMI gives you the diet that will unlock the key to better health, and it's all based on your unique individuality.
Logged
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 1 - 109
Drea
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:08am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

SWAMI Warrior ~ Taster, NN, ENFJ
Sun Beh Nim
Moderator
Posts: 11,536
Gender: Female
Location: Northern New Mexico
Age: 52
I was under the impression that "compliancy" had to do with whether you were avoiding avoids, not the level of eating beneficials to neutrals. Good to know what was intended, but I agree with KK. I have not been avoid free, but very close; especially since I finally got the low-down on Tier One/Tier Two.


It is not my responsibility to convince anyone of anything.
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 2 - 109
Carol the Dabbler
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:20am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gluten-Free Raw-Food Vegan
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 2,774
Gender: Female
Location: Indiana, USA
Age: 69
That's what I always thought, too -- that, for example, "70% compliant" meant you were eating 30% Avoids.

How does this jibe with Dr. D's advice in ER4YT, not to worry too much about eating what you're served at a friend's house?  And how in the sweet name of all that's holy could anyone ever eat in a restaurant?

Can anyone find any definition of "compliance" in LR4YT?

And here I thought I was doing so well, with my only Avoids being in some of my supplements, plus an occasional meal away from home ....  



Carol

A+ nonnie married to an A+ secretor
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 3 - 109
ISA-MANUELA
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 8:36am Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
when I recognized that even now in the canadian healthbooks created by Dr. Pizzorno and M.Murray
*secretorstatus* is that important...then I am very happy to be now (without any café at this time)
that I am  98% compliant to the AB-nonnie-food....but what I am concerned now is, Peter wrote in LR4YT some little sentences about us the A2B nonnies.... and here I think I must be muchmore carefull
thers'a lot to learn and to discover....
My sister is also an AB and I think she is also a nonnie....but she eats similar to a vegetarian....but more because she  is convinced about this lifestyle...when I looked at her skin...sorry just awful but this is a
genetic  question because she is a psoriatic   .......lucky me that I came on board only one year later..... our little brother died with 7 months....

Revision History (1 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 8:38am
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 4 - 109
Dr. D
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 1:13pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Peter D'Adamo
Kwan Jhang Nim
Posts: 4,150
Gender: Male
Location: Connecticut
Age: 58
I'm not a big fan of slapping kilometer markers on what constitutes doing the diet.  What works for you constitutes 'doing the diet.'

But sometimes you have to.

In designing a new study we are trying to work out what exactly constitutes 'following the diet.'

So far we have three categories to test subject:

1. 'Deal Breaker':  this category cannot be used in the study. Examples would be type A's on pork or some other red meat avoid or type O's on wheat. These people cannot be said to be doing the BTD at all; neither in action or spirit.

2. 'Reasonable Aherence': These are people who are getting beneficials and avoids in and out of their diet in a manner prescribed by the BTD, but not to a level considered 'High Compliance'. They may or may not be doing the appropriate exercise. These people can be used in the study, but probably need to be followed for at least 4-8 weeks for any analysis.

3. High Compliance': These people routinely (read daily) consume beneficials and so rarely consume avoids as to have it consitute an 'event' when it occurs. An 'event' represents and occurence of less than 4-5 times per week. They also perform the prescribed exercises and stress reduction techniques. These people can be tested for physiologic changes due to the BTD within 7-10 days.


People will keep food diaries and talk to a followup investigator every evening so as to ascertain their compliance.




A whole system is a living system is a learning system.’ -Stewart Brand
Logged
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 5 - 109
EquiPro
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 1:35pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer!
Sam Dan
Posts: 2,330
Gender: Female
Wow - for all of my foibles, I actually fall into the "high compliance" set.  I figured I'd fall into 2.  Just goes to show that it's not worth getting all over ones self when one has a diet "event"!


FRESH START TODAY!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 6 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 2:39pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
Bolded emphasis added for purposes of this post:

Quoted from admin
...3. High Compliance': These people routinely (read daily) consume beneficials and so rarely consume avoids as to have it consitute an 'event' when it occurs. An 'event' represents and occurence of less than 4-5 times per week...

Dr. D., did you mean less than 4 - 5 times per YEAR?  Or at least month?  Surely if someone is eating avoids (and even this gets tricky, because there are avoids and then there are AVOIDS, imho, but moving along...), as in, "biggies", up to 4 to 5 times per WEEK, that wouldn't be high compliance...would it?


"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 7 - 109
Suzanne
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 2:53pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Type O 1st/ Hunter 2nd
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 662
Gender: Female
Location: Texas
Age: 61
Quoted from "Ask Doctor D'Adamo"
http://www.dadamo.com/bloggers/ask/archives/00000302.htm

"Generally 70-80% total compliance works well in most people (out of 10 food choices, 7-9 being neutral or beneficial choices)"

There is a conflict between the FAQ post and the Ask Doctor D'Adamo post regarding neutrals.  

As a healthy person nearing 55, I would find a diet of 80% beneficials and 20% neutrals to be too restrictive to be practical. However I am happy and content with my current diet of 98% beneficials and neutrals and only rare avoids.


Good health to you and your household! And good health to all that is yours!  1 Samuel 25:6

Revision History (1 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 2:57pm
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 8 - 109
grey rabbit
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 2:58pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

swamix 47% Teacher-INFP
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 3,303
Gender: Female
Location: Seattle
Age: 57
PT, I would think the 4 to 5 times per week might include something as small as the wrong kind of gelatin capsul on a suppliment? or something else as small. IMHO it would be nearly impossible to be 100% perfectly compliant, it would border on obsesive/compulsive behavior. I have also noticed that some avoids hit me like a brick, and others don't seem to bother me that much.


“Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It’s perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we’ve learned something from yesterday.”

John Wayne's last words
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 9 - 109
Kristin
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:04pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT6 Nomad
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 2,493
Gender: Female
Location: Colorado
Age: 53
I don't think a gelatin capsule would constitute an "event" though... and there are avoids that we consume with out our knowledge.

But I agree with PT... I think 4-5 times per week of big avoids consumption seems a bit over the top for how I relate to the BTD.


The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not expect to sit.

- Nelson Henderson
Logged
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 10 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:08pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
Quoted from samy
PT...I have also noticed that some avoids hit me like a brick, and others don't seem to bother me that much.

Oh, very true, I certainly eat some avoids pert near every day, frankly, but certain big ones I completely stay away from, such as wheat.  The ones I eat are either ones I deem "minor" (like maybe a spot of cinnamon here or a little cold-pressed safflower oil as an ingredient in a boxed butternut squash soup there) or ones that I find I can tolerate well (and who knows if ER4YG will bear me out on those).  I guess I was thinking that, if Dr. D. is talking about fair-to-middlin' major avoids, "less than 4 - 5 times weekly" seems like a potentially relatively large amount (if the person indeed had the given avoid up to 4 or 5 times per week) to be considered "high compliance", as that means having it/them almost every day of the week.



"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page

Revision History (3 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:13pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:12pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:09pm
changed "potentially large" to "potentially relatively large"
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 11 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:11pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
P.S.  I really like how, in the definition of #3, high compliance, it includes that the person would routinely consume beneficials, not just avoid avoids.  I know for myself, sometimes I get so focused on avoiding avoids, it is hard to remember to try to fit in some beneficials EVERY day, and that is certainly a very important aspect of BTD compliance, too!


"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 12 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:23pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
P.P.S.  I wonder, when I was consuming those Kettle brand potato chips yet otherwise highly compliant, would I have been considered a Cat 1 "deal breaker", because, for me as an O nonnie and also as someone who clearly has an addictive response to them, the chips are a major avoid, even though perhaps for an O secretor without any addictive response, they are a Tier Two avoid?  Interestingly, I think an individual such as myself in that example would either be considered highly compliant or a deal breaker, but not somewhere in the middle because indeed I was highly compliant except for the pink elephant in the room, but what a deal-breaking pink elephant it was!

I think we can see, even just from this discussion, just what a complex issue/concept "compliance" truly is.  I am not saying it is necessarily something completely relative and subjective and varies from individual to individual based upon that specific individual's body, health, hardwiring and goals, but I am saying that, while there ARE objective, universal standards of what constitutes compliance, these are sort of impacted all around the edges by all these blasted variables, making doing any sort of study a very tricky thing to do.  It sounds like Dr. D. is going about it the right way and taking the complexities of the thing into consideration.

Then there is also the PORTION guideline aspect of the thing, which can also be ignored by an individual (trust me *lol*) in such a way that, even if said individual is being highly compliant in terms of avoiding avoids, s/he is still not going, necessarily, to reap the full benefits of the diet because, like in my case, I tend to go CRAZY on compliant grains (right now I'm on a rice cake bender, for example) and that is really (apparently, although I can't figure out what is going on with me right now--but that's another story) impacting my weight, as while I am doing so well on the diet AND exercise fronts now, I am GAINING weight (?)(&$#WTF?(*#&?).

Very sticky wicket, this compliance concept.  VERY multi-layered and complex.

* Regarding "compliance" as a quantitative/measurable entity being either subjective or objective, to quote a great teacher:  very often, an issue isn't "either/or", it is "both/and".


"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page

Revision History (8 edits; 4 reasons shown)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:37pm
DONE: I mean it
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:34pm
hey, what happened to "done II"?  here it is!  "done II":  it lives!
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:31pm
"done" III:  this time, it's personal
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:29pm
son of "done":  the untold story, part I, the prequel...
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 13 - 109
EquiPro
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:32pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer!
Sam Dan
Posts: 2,330
Gender: Female
Well, if we eat 21 meals per week plus most people have at least 1 snack per day, that equals  28 consumptions of food per week minimum.  If we were to take eating an avoid "event" as, let's say, eating one oreo 4-5 times per week, that really isn't much in the avoid arena overall.  I don't think that an "event" would be eating a complete meal of pizza (O perspective here), meaning that 4-5 MEALS per week are avoids, but rather you eat a candy bar that has some corn syrup in it for a snack, or you go to Costco and can resist the sample of whatever.  

While we aren't talking vitamin capsules here or the errent ingredient in otherwise beneficial foods, we are talking what I think often happens in our lives.

About once a week, we go out for fast food (hamburgers) because my daughter loves them.  I sometimes get a salad with a beef patty on it, but more often, this is one of those "events".  I get a small hamburger, with cheese.  That means I'm getting some cheese, some mustard, some pickles and a small wheat bun.  I usually eat a few fries (but potatoes are not my thing, so I don't do much) and I'll have a sip or two of her shake.  Maybe once in a blue moon I'll get a shake too.

This is a meal full of avoids, BUT, it is part of our life and I enjoy it.  It is an event, and a big deal to my daughter.  I could eat better there, and sometimes I do, but in general, this is my life.

Do I do this more than once a week?  Rarely.  Most of our meals are eaten at home, and at home, there are no avoids.  I focus in on bennies at each meal, even when I eat out.  We don't eat out much, so this is sort of a non-issue.

I'm not as compliant as Suzanne (the blogger), or PT, BUT if I look at my food overall, it probably DOES fall into the highly compliant catogory on a week in, week out basis.

Personally, I've never thought that eating a gelatin capsule was going to throw a healthy person into ill-health.  I was crazed with that sort of compliance while I was a Vegan and it just fed into my own eating disorder.

Compared to many here, I am only mediumly complaint.  That's why I was happy to see Dr. Ds post, as it confirms that, even at my worst, I'm doing better than most.


FRESH START TODAY!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 14 - 109
EquiPro
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:38pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer!
Sam Dan
Posts: 2,330
Gender: Female
One thing that I have found interesting and that I have really upped this year, is getting in the perscribed amount of bennie fruits and veggies and keeping that in the forefront of my brain.  Amazingly, if I really keep focussing in on getting in those portions, compliance becomes much easier because it is a LOT of food to eat AND it is hard to go on a bender when you're trying to get in all the fruits and veggies.

So, for me, compliance is very much about the recommended portions.  It is much easier for me to be non-compliant, when I am not thinking about how much food I have to get in, in terms of fruits and veggies.  That, alone, has upped my compliance tremendously.

I understand what PT is talking about, too.  One of the most dangerous foods for me to have in the house is cooked pasta, even if it is the completely compliant Tinyada rice pasta.  Actually, rice, itself, is a danger.  While both are neutrals, they are, indeed, my pink elephant.  I can really be quite compliant with it, only slighly going over the allowances, but it creates problems for me, so it is best left alone.  With cooked pasta in the house, that gets eaten FIRST with butter and nutritional yeast or whatever.  It makes keeping my focus nearly impossible, and I find myself full without having gotten in my veggies and fruits, so I end up ahead of my starch allowance and behind on fruits and veggies, all from just having a trigger food, albeit a compliant one, in the house.


FRESH START TODAY!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 15 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:43pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
Quoted from EquiPro
...If we were to take eating an avoid "event" as, let's say, eating one oreo 4-5 times per week, that really isn't much in the avoid arena overall.  I don't think that an "event" would be eating a complete meal of pizza (O perspective here), meaning that 4-5 MEALS per week are avoids, but rather you eat a candy bar that has some corn syrup in it for a snack, or you go to Costco and can't resist the sample of whatever.

Sorry, but imo, if someone is doing the exact things/examples in your quote above up to 4 to 5 times per week, that is not high compliance.  Just mho...

Edited to add:  In fact, imho, those are "deal breaker" examples because of the nature of the particular avoids listed* and the frequency.

Edited to add:  I mean, it's wheat, it's genetically-modified corn syrup, it is hydrogenated and transfats, it is artificial flavors and colors.  The BTD--while this is only rarely if ever explicitly stated in the books and other media--is a lot about purity--about whole, pure foods and quality foods--and those items above not only contain major O avoids like wheat and corn syrup, but are basically avoids for all by virtue of the fact that they are so junky/impure/faux food-like, that when they are in your system they basically make it virtually impossible for the BTD to do its job, as they are counteracting everything else you are doing.  So, again, if someone is ingesting such items up to 4 to 5 times per week, imo--and this is just my opinion, mind--I personally could not characterize their compliance level as "high".



"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page

Revision History (4 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:55pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:54pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:46pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:44pm
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 16 - 109
EquiPro
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 3:54pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer!
Sam Dan
Posts: 2,330
Gender: Female
Yea, well, that's why I was surprised by Dr. D's post and interested to find that I fall into "high compliance".

If we look, however, beyond avoids by taking in other things, too, then the 4-5 avoids per week makes more sense.

I am exercising HARD - often to fatigue - 6-7 days per week.
I am getting in all of my water each day
I am getting in the bennies and the neutrals and getting in a wide variety of foods

All of these things, together, would seem to make it easier to see that the 4-5 avoid events per week would still allow for high compliance, since the BTD is more than just which foods we should eat.


FRESH START TODAY!!!

Revision History (1 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:34pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 17 - 109
Kristin
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:02pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

GT6 Nomad
Kyosha Nim
Columnists and Bloggers
Posts: 2,493
Gender: Female
Location: Colorado
Age: 53
I've always thought it interesting that the word "compliance" was chosen and used to describe following the BTD lifestyle... rather than a word like adherence, for example.

Compliance, in my mind, implys choice... is more fluid rather than rigid... perhaps allows for more gray area rather than a black and white.."you do it this way or you're not doing it" approach.


The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not expect to sit.

- Nelson Henderson
Logged
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 18 - 109
Drea
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:03pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

SWAMI Warrior ~ Taster, NN, ENFJ
Sun Beh Nim
Moderator
Posts: 11,536
Gender: Female
Location: Northern New Mexico
Age: 52
Quoted from admin

3. High Compliance: These people routinely (read daily) consume beneficials and so rarely consume avoids as to have it consitute an 'event' when it occurs. An 'event' represents and occurence of less than 4-5 times per week. They also perform the prescribed exercises and stress reduction techniques.

First thing I note about this statement is there isn't any mention of neutrals. If this is indeed the case, and it would be since it came from Dr. D himself, then I have fallen into category 3 since January. Perhaps 'fallen' isn't the right word...'chosen' would be more accurate.

I understand that there are avoids, and then there are AVOIDS, but the way I read Dr. D's statement, is that if a person consumes any avoid more than 4-5 times a week, then they have fallen out of High Compliance.

I have not only been consciously avoiding all avoids (yes, even those gelatin capsule but for the reason that gelatin itself grosses me out more than that it is an avoid), and choosing beneficials over neutrals wherever possible. I just find that eating only beneficials is just too hard. I tried it for about two weeks, but I don't think I could maintain it for any length of time, especially because I do eat out occasionally.


It is not my responsibility to convince anyone of anything.
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 19 - 109
Jane
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:08pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Kyosha Nim
Posts: 3,614
Gender: Female
Location: Metrowest Boston, MA
Age: 70
I think for years now I've been mostly just avoiding the avoids.  I don't spend hours planning my meals to make sure that I'm getting the right portions per week.  I NEVER knowingly have any wheat or corn but I do go out to eat at least once a week and who knows what's in some things that you get, even when you make a point of asking.  I eat too much compliant dairy and very occasionally some non-compliant dairy.  It doesn't bother me if it's not too much or too often.  I eat too many Pamela's and too much chocolate although I'm really trying to cut down.  I do eat a lot of salads and veggies (although probably not enough variety).  I love red meat.  I eat chicken (often chicken salad) because it's easy for lunches at work.  I need to get more strenuous exercise.  I ski most Saturdays but my knees are sore and stiff afterwards even though I wear neoprene braces.  It's tough to get old!

I think of myself as moderately compliant even though my grown kids and my friends and relatives think I'm some kind of health/food freak.
Jane

Revision History (1 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:15pm
Logged Offline
Private Message Private message Reply: 20 - 109
Drea
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:13pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

SWAMI Warrior ~ Taster, NN, ENFJ
Sun Beh Nim
Moderator
Posts: 11,536
Gender: Female
Location: Northern New Mexico
Age: 52
Quoted from Jane
I think of myself as moderately compliant even though my grown kids and my friends and relatives think I'm some kind of health/feed freak.
Jane

My friends say I eat "too healthy". Is there such a thing, I ask? I think it's because they haven't taken the time to try it for themselves to really KNOW the benefits.


It is not my responsibility to convince anyone of anything.
Logged Offline
Site Site Private Message Private message Reply: 21 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 4:57pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
Quoted from EquiPro
One thing that I have found interesting and that I have really upped this year, is getting in the perscribed amount of bennie fruits and veggies and keeping that in the forefront of my brain.  Amazingly, if I really keep focussing in on getting in those portions, compliance becomes much easier because it is a LOT of food to eat AND it is hard to go on a bender when you're trying to get in all the fruits and veggies.

That is a really excellent and important point, Equi!  That is why I like it so much and think it is great that, in Dr. D.'s working definition of high compliance, he includes "These people routinely (read daily) consume beneficials...", as compliance is indeed about what we DO consume, just as much as it is about what we DON'T consume.  Beneficials are crucial to fit in each day, and we just don't focus on this enough, at least I don't, I'm so busy avoiding avoids.  Also, as you point out, compliance with eating the amounts of what we ARE supposed to eat--such as and, it could be argued, ESPECIALLY fruits and vegetables--is crucial to supporting our own compliance in not eating what we shouldn't, because 1.) there simply isn't room, and 2. when we eat in balance, we are less likely to want to overeat too much of one thing (like grains), as we have had enough of something else (such as fruits).  I know for myself, when I am overeating grains as I am lately (ricke cakes), I am concurrently NOT eating enough fruits and, to a lesser extent, veggies.

Very good point, Rachel.  I think what is coming out in this discussion is that there are so many different aspects of compliance:  what we DO eat as well as what we DON'T, paying attention to the portion guidelines (d*mn!), not only in terms of not exceeding the recommended portions for any given thing, but making sure that we DO eat the minimum recommended portions of any given thing.  So, there are as many positive aspects of compliance (by "positive", I mean things like DO eat this and DO eat this amount of that) as there are negatives.  There are as many DO's as there are DON'T's, and sometimes we--I--forget to pay attention to the do's, which are so critical to aiding us in our overall compliance, balance and good results with the BTD.



"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 22 - 109
Peppermint Twist
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:00pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator

Gatherer; iNfj; BTD/GTD aficionado; lost 97 lbs
Kyosha Nim
Posts: 11,030
Gender: Female
Location: Florida
Age: 53
Quoted from Kristin
I've always thought it interesting that the word "compliance" was chosen and used to describe following the BTD lifestyle... rather than a word like adherence, for example.

Compliance, in my mind, implys choice... is more fluid rather than rigid... perhaps allows for more gray area rather than a black and white.."you do it this way or you're not doing it" approach.

Actually, if I may be so bold, I believe (not sure, but believe) I was the first to choose that word, and I posted on the old board as to why I used and liked that word, basically for the reason you just stated!  I didn't like the idea that if you're not doing it PERFECTLY, you're not doing it; you are either on it, or off it!  I felt that was "reductionist", if you will, and didn't fit the BTD, which is a lifetime, sustainable way of life and, as such, doesn't imply perfection/failure, black/white, on/off, good/bad.  There are middles and shades of gray.  And it (the word "compliance") seems to have stuck!  Following a diet for a lifetime is a process, a journey, a daily series of choices.  I felt that the word "compliance", for me, allowed for that and for levels, shades of gray, etc.  It took perfection/failure out of the mix and made it about choices and individual customization.  I'm glad it has become the word of choice used to discuss following the BTD.

Edited to add:  mind you, that is all not to say that one can never be said to be OFF the diet, that there is no such thing.  In fact, using myself as an example, I've been on the BTD since 1997, with varying levels of compliance throughout, however, there was one period of time in there when I would actually say I was OFF the diet, as I intentionally choose to just totally abandon the diet.  I would not call that "low compliance", I would call that "deal breaker" *lol*, as in, off, gone, goodbye, not on the thaaang.  That was my choice.  However, the whole rest of the time, I have been "on" the diet (hey, "on the diet", wasn't that a great column?), even though--especially when I was a newbie pup, which, since I seem to have a slow learning curve on some things, was several YEARS after discovering the board and learning from y'all--I would sometimes struggle mightily with cravings and going on little binges, but I was trying and I would always struggle back and finally I learned how to keep myself on track or at least from completely jumping the rails, I'm grateful to say.  But it would have made me feel worse during those struggly moments, and more like a "failure" than I already did, had I thought with dismay "Oh, I'm completely OFF the diet!"  I like the word "compliance" because it meant that, even when I tripped and fell, I was still on the diet on some level, just having a rough patch.

The only folks I would say are totally OFF the diet are those who choose to be off the diet and also those who are really in denial about just the type, amount and frequency of avoids they are eating.  But that last category would have to be pretty blatent (even a little denial doesn't mean one is off the diet, it takes a whale of a lot of denial *lol*), like, if someone says "I'm highly compliant!" but then goes on to mention that, well, they do eat an entire bowl of wheat pasta every day, or they say that they have a Double Latte Frappe Chaka Khan Mocha Choca Ya Ya Da Da Deluxe Wing Ding Shimmy Shimmy Cocoa Bop Balooza Double Decker Whipped Cream Coffee Surprise from Starbucks every single day.  Even then, though, to me, they aren't exactly OFF the diet, just not as highly compliant as maybe they think they are.  You are on the BTD, in my book, if you are making an effort to be on the BTD.  However, imperfect, if you are trying, you are at least somewhat compliant.  High compliance, on the other hand, is a horse of a different color, and a horse that eschews Oreos, candy bars, Starbucks, potato chips (d*mn!), etc., pretty much entirely, but definitely more than up to 4 to 5 times per week.


"If you are on one of Dr. D's diets and it isn't joyful, you aren't doing it right." - moi

my Facebook page

Revision History (6 edits; 4 reasons shown)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:25pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:22pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:19pm
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 5:05pm
Logged
Private Message Private message Reply: 23 - 109
Serena
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:19pm Report to Moderator Report to Moderator
Guest User
I will openly state/re-iterate, I do not avoid vinegar. I haven't found a vinegar free mustard, mayo, or salad dressing I like. And while I make my own dressing on occasion, lemon juice doesn't cut it. (Slowly finding a way to make it work with lime juice and cider vinegar, but that's another story)... But I LOVE my mustard and mayo (not willing to make mayo...). And I go a little overboard on my dairy allowance sometimes. And the grains. Working desperately to get down to the 6 servings a week... (I think I'm at 9 or 10 a week...) Still take my motto from finding nemo though... (Fish are friends not food)

I'll have fast food twice and or cheesecake once a month. I fight tooth and nail to stay out of all but one restaurant (Let's go to the make your own stirfry place or my place to cook- no where else...) If it has an avoid listed, I generally don't eat it. That includes the corn sugars, artificial sugars, non-compliant oils (safflower oil is in too many things *roll eyes*). I'll admit, if a fave food has pepper as the last ingredient, I'll probably eat it. And if I'm served pototoes, I'll eat some. Basically, I'm anal about 98% of the avoids, except when I feel like a treat. I don't really binge on anything- no rice cake benders for me

I'd like to think I fall somewhere in between the reasonable adherance and high compliance (High adherance perhaps? ) Exercise is done, wheat is the devil (I like how O's eating wheat are dismissed- good call!! ) I'd say at least 70% of the veggies I eat are bennie (darn those tomatoes and carrots...) Get my fruit, love my beef, eat my walnuts...

For the most part, I'm quite pleased with where I am.

Revision History (1 edits)
Lloyd  -  Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 6:20pm
Logged
E-mail E-mail Reply: 24 - 109
5 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 » All Recommend Thread
Print Print Thread

BTD Forums    Diet and Nutrition    Eat Right 4 Your Type  ›  Definition of "Compliance"

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread