Dr. Peter D'Adamo - Latest comments on Wiki-bullies http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php?blog=24&disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 In response to: Wiki-bullies Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:48:55 +0000 me [Visitor] c510@http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/ Wikipedia page on D'Adamo deleted per his request??? Haha! Looks like they deleted it because there's no evidence he's a notable person.<br /><br /><br /> <br /> <i><b> That's true. However, I was the one who told the Wikimedia Foundation that I was not 'sufficiently notable' since it as the only way I could get them to delete the article. They will not 'officially' delete an article simply because it is poorly written. Sorry to disappoint you. Frankly from your fixation with this sort of minutiae and your fake email address, I hazard you might have an even less notable life than mine.--PD </b></i><br /><br /> <blockquote><br /> Re: [Ticket#2007121310013944] My page on wikipedia<br /> December 13, 2007 12:07:59 PM EST<br /> <br /> "Because if the wikipedia project feels that you are sufficently notable, then they want an entry on you. I have nominated the article for deletion and we shall see what the community feels. Thank you."<br /> <br /> Yours sincerely,<br /> Avi Isaacson<br /> <br /> </blockquote><br /> <br />


That's true. However, I was the one who told the Wikimedia Foundation that I was not 'sufficiently notable' since it as the only way I could get them to delete the article. They will not 'officially' delete an article simply because it is poorly written. Sorry to disappoint you. Frankly from your fixation with this sort of minutiae and your fake email address, I hazard you might have an even less notable life than mine.--PD


Re: [Ticket#2007121310013944] My page on wikipedia
December 13, 2007 12:07:59 PM EST

"Because if the wikipedia project feels that you are sufficently notable, then they want an entry on you. I have nominated the article for deletion and we shall see what the community feels. Thank you."

Yours sincerely,
Avi Isaacson



]]> http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php/2008/07/30/wiki-unctuous?blog=24#c510 In response to: Wiki-bullies Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:03:21 +0000 Valhal [Visitor] c467@http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/ How do the Vegans explain that I, at the age of 31, got rid of ALL my life long pestering allergies, lost 10 pounds, became less irritable, and felt more energetic than at age 20 after I increased my intake of BEEF and stopped eating wheat? <br /> -Also, for the sake of animal welfare I did stop eating meet for about 5 months when i was in my late 20's, I ate a lot of beans, legumes and nuts as reccomended in numerous vegetarian books and yet,-It made me feel totally misserable.<br /> -Also, for the sake of animal welfare I did stop eating meet for about 5 months when i was in my late 20's, I ate a lot of beans, legumes and nuts as reccomended in numerous vegetarian books and yet,-It made me feel totally misserable.
]]> http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php/2008/07/30/wiki-unctuous?blog=24#c467 In response to: Wiki-bullies Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:25:24 +0000 Peppermint Twist [Visitor] c436@http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/ What's an "MLM website"? Inquiring minds want to know! Anyway, about Wikipedia, it is sometimes a good starting/jumping-off point to learn about a topic but I think it has the reputation of being notoriously unreliable, accuracy-wise, because it is user-created/edited, so I would hope that most people know to take what they read there with a grain of high-quality sea salt.<br /> <br /> Anyway..."MLM website"...??? "Mostly Lousy Malarkey"?<br /> <br /> <i>MLM= 'multi-level marketing' -p</i>
Anyway..."MLM website"...??? "Mostly Lousy Malarkey"?

MLM= 'multi-level marketing' -p]]> http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php/2008/07/30/wiki-unctuous?blog=24#c436 In response to: Wiki-bullies Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:22:22 +0000 Sprocket [Visitor] c433@http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/ I'm so glad you finally went to wikipedia and left this on the page.<br /> <br /> Most individuals are woefully uninformed as to how complex (and expensive) a double-blind study would have to be, to adequately "test" the BTD.<br /> <br /> Besides, how would you ensure that your test subjects only ate what they were supposed to?<br /> <br />
Most individuals are woefully uninformed as to how complex (and expensive) a double-blind study would have to be, to adequately "test" the BTD.

Besides, how would you ensure that your test subjects only ate what they were supposed to?

]]> http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php/2008/07/30/wiki-unctuous?blog=24#c433 In response to: Wiki-bullies Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:46:14 +0000 R. Turner [Visitor] c432@http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/ Amen! If all those touted "double-blind studies" performed by drug manufacturors and approved by the FDA always produce safe pharmaceuticals, why are there almost as many commercials for lawsuits against them for damages?? Personally, give me the "circumstantial evidence"! If all those who dare to present new theories without absolute scientific proof were unwilling to subject themselves to the slings and arrows of the jealous and the close-minded, mankind would spiral into a worthless pit of apathy. Thank you, Dr. D, for persevering! http://www.dadamo.com/B2blogs/blogs/index.php/2008/07/30/wiki-unctuous?blog=24#c432