| « Fever | Substituting - recipes & exercise » |
Is my government trying to kill me?
If you think this blog is about rationed health care, you are wrong. We already have rationed health care. If you need a heart, kidney or liver transplant, you go on a national waiting list. When an organ becomes available, there is a group that evaluates the people on the list and determines who gets the transplant.
Insurance companies do their own version of health care rationing. I spoke to a friend yesterday who has rheumatoid arthritis. She periodically needs a treatment that costs several thousand dollars. Each time her doctor must submit an application to the insurance company who decides whether she gets the treatment or not. The same application process requires to many medical tests, including PET scans that look for cancer metastasis.
As health care becomes more nationalized, such boards will become more centralized and more powerful. You may not like the term death panels (Obamacare calls them Independent Payment Advisory Board) but this is how a proponent of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act describes them:
The term refers to any of the multitude of expert commissions whose charge will be to dispassionately examine the scientific evidence in order to determine which patients will get what, when and how. These bodies, in fact, will be explicitly aiming to optimize the medical outcomes of the entire population titrated to the amount of money we’re allowed to spend on healthcare.
Sounds to me like somebody besides me and my doctor will be deciding whether I get treatment. But none of that is what this blog is about.
This blog is about the new USDA MyPlate for Better Nutrition.
I ordered supplements a few days ago from the Vitamin Shoppe, and when my order arrived, it included a flyer that tells me, “The US Government did away with the archaic and impractical food pyramid and implemented a more useful MyPlate icon to guide Americans toward consuming a balanced diet.”
The problem with this new guide is that if a Type O followed it, they would face weight gain, higher cholesterol, stomach inflammation, and joint issues.
I went on the USDA MyPlate Website put my age, height, weight, and physical activity level into the daily food plan guide. It tells me that every day I need to eat:
6 ounces of grain
2.5 cups of vegetables
2 cups of fruit
3 cups of dairy
5.5 ounces of protein
More grain than protein?!?
More dairy than vegetables?!?
What are they thinking?!?
I am not a conspiracy theorist – not by a long shot.
The title of this blog was more to get you to read it and think than to make a statement about the motives of government agencies.
However, this new plan makes me all the more thankful for the Blood Type Diet and for Dr. D who developed it. Perhaps if I ignore the USDA plan and eat Right for My Type, I will dodge the more insidious rationing panels as I get older.
4 comments
Really, the best kind of "one size fits all" advice you can give has to be vague, to allow for individuality. If you tell people to eat whole foods, avoid artificial additives, and limit added sugars, you really can't go wrong for any type.
I don't think the USDA is intentionally trying to kill us. I think they're just trying to protect the profits of grain farmers.
Your comment about diet related diseases sent a chill up my spine.
Renaming the food pyramid is at least implicit acknowledgement that it has garnered justified criticism.
I have two quotes that apply to this issue:
"In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in everything, charity" - Augustine of Hippo
Unity in the choice of food is not an essential for any civilized society.
“Reader, I think proper, before we proceed any further together, to acquaint thee that I intend to digress, through this whole history, as often as I see occasion, of which I am myself a better judge than any pitiful critic whatever; and here I must desire all those critics to mind their own business, and not to intermeddle with affairs or works which no ways concern them; for till they produce the authority by which they are constituted judges, I shall not plead to their jurisdiction.”
― Henry Fielding, The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling
Given a rich history of the depth and expense of government-backed folly, I likewise reserve my right to refuse such ill-informed condescension.
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
